RE: if the baby in question did not issue from US citizens
1. You used the PLURAL. What if either father or mother are American Citizens at the baby’s birth ?
2. I did refer to “subject to jurisdiction” in my previous post, that is why we’re discussing it here. What exactly does jurisdiction mean in this context? When you are in the USA, in what way are you NOT subject to American jurisdiction? You must obey all American laws even if you are not from this country when you live here. Isn’t that being subject to American jurisdiction?
3. Let’s not conflate being born an American Citizen with being a NATURAL BORN American Citizen. The former ( in the case of Kamala ) is BEYOND DISPUTE. Kamala did not need to be naturalized because she was already a citizen at birth. Is she a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN ? *THAT* is the issue that is still in dispute ( but not by anyone in leadership today ).
Then the child has mixed loyalties to its parents citizenship. The object of Natural Born Citizen requirement for office of President is to remove mixed loyalties so there is no question. Like Trump. Not like Obama or Harris.
Your second point is outside the scope of US President qualifications of Natural Born Citizen.
Your third point left out the consideration of "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" yet again. So it, too, is outside the scope of US President qualification of Natural Born Citizen, so don't expect another reply.