[Hot Tabasco]

As for Harris, both her parents were here on passports subject to a foreign jurisdiction when she was born.

Irrelevant, she was born in the United States.....nothing else matters.

Vivek was born of parents here, but without a date of swearing in as US citizens,

Irrelevant, Vivek was born in the United States. Nothing else matters.......

Now let me ask my question again: Why wasn't the eligibility of the above ever challenged in court by barristers more knowledgable in such laws than you?

If you think you're so God damn smart on Constitutional law, then contact your Congressman and Senator and ask them why they were all allowed to run for the office of the President.

Till then, stop wasting your time trying to make an argument that has been proven false over and over again............Sheesh!

Time wasted, end of conversation.

[RideForever]

Minor v. Happersett was used most recently to resolve this very issue with John McCain's candidacy, since he was born outside the US from parents stationed on an Army base. He was running for President, so the Natural Born Citizen requirement in the Constitution was germane then. Minor v Happersett ruled that meant born of US citizen parents, regardless of location. Why would any sane person think any other country would have a different policy?

As to your change the subject bot ploy, the barristers bear allegiance to King George, not to US citizens. As for the childish tantrum that followed, I'm wondering if that is a bot tool when confronted with overwhelming facts.

link to case