No problem, sir.
He thinks he is some kind of business man. You were correct about distributors distributing other products. Beer consumption is not declining because of Bud Light. Bud and Bud Light are homogeneous products that are fungible. Rooster lacks a grasp of basic economics and common decency. Why would anyone want to buy a brand associated with gender deniers and groomers when there are hundreds of other brands that can be purchased or better yet, made? Bud Light is permanently tainted. It belongs on the trash heap of history in testament to bad business decisions. It’s the stuff Harvard Business Review case studies are made. (Although, I’m not sure they read the same as 40+ years ago when I was in B-school.)