Posted on 05/19/2023 6:05:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
I don’t trust Infowars any farther than I can throw a Buick, but I hope it’s true.
Then you deserve all the “brought to you by Pfizer” lies you can slobber up.
Name one thing you heard Alex Jones say that wasn’t true.
Not something “brought to you by Pfizer” told you he said, but something you actually heard him say.
My Buick wagon weighs about 4900#——1979 model—STEEL
Heads up re kari’s closing argument.
Several short video clips of her atty found at link
Uyghur Brand organs are high quality and easily available for all.
I don’t think you posted that where you intended to post it.
Closing argument for Lake was awesome. Don’t think the judge will overturn it, but expect him to recommend radical changes should be made. It’s a very sloppy system (I’ve worked elections in my mail-in state), sloppiness opens the door to cheating
Getting a verdict of guilty of allowing fraudulent ballots to be counted in the governor's race is implicit acknowledgement that those same ballots were counted in the Presidential race. Once a state is found guilty of counting falsified Presidential ballots, that opens up the viability of other states having done the same.
In other words, a guilty finding destroys the argument that never before has there been fraud large enough to matter. Once that argument is shattered, all the other excuses ring hollow.
-PJ
Kari Lake said she would never quit ... and she hasn’t quit!
Amazing woman! A great patriot!
I put it inadvertantly one post below where it should have gone.
You heard him say that?
Everything he says is on video.
Got a link?
I can’t find where Jones said it, but it appears that a lot of people do believe China is murdering Uyghurs for their organs. Are you saying it’s not true?
I haven’t followed this case much but did they identify the guy clicking through names faster then he could even read them? Have they interrogated him and found out who put him up to this? Any investigation? Was it one of Hobbes cronies?
Wordplay in court. Defense atty was trying to get analysis distinguished from data acquisition and say extracting data into a spreadsheet is ‘analysis’ if it has averages in it. And the witness doesn’t have the certifications from others of his abilities to claim analysis. Anyone who has worked with pivot tables saw right thru the bogus argument.
They have the name.
The guy in charge of the count admits he doesn’t know the difference between percentage and average.
https://twitter.com/doctormalibu/status/1659611187452203008
This would have been a good point in the trial to suggest an audit using a set of 100 signatures in a test file for audit purposes of prospective checkers, and current checkers to see real world results as a guide. Don't know if Kari can put that into her closing arguments. Maybe the worker really can be that fast and accurate in accept / reject process of ballots. But the court test should be for 1000 to see if the pace drops.
And the state gets a tool to be used in future elections.
Maybe the worker really can be that fast and accurate in accept / reject process of ballots. But the court test should be for 1000 to see if the pace drops.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxx
The guys was clicking thru thise screens like he was slapping a penny slot machine
The only reason she has a chance is because the court would not permit an inquiry into the voting machines, only the one area which is only dependent upon the human element 100%.
They could never allow evidence of the cheating by voting machine and electronic modification of vote tallies, since that would affect voting world wide.
The limited court hang out was to permit this one stab at election malfeasance (not fraud) which is limited to one election, and one election only.
This case is corrupt from the beginning, and even a victory for Kari Lake will be a hollow one as it will not be permitted to expose the greatest of the frauds.
Besides, the trial court will rule against her and expect the appellate courts to make the decision.
I’m scratchin my head. This was for a 2022 gov. race. No presidents on the ballots...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.