Garland might be less damaging as a single SC vote compared to the corruption he is unleashing at the DOJ and FBI right now.
A follow up to my previous post to you:
Now that I have read your many posts on this thread, spot on! I truly hope many digest what you are stating.
I wish there was less agitating and more debate on this platform. Thoughtful posts are either ignored or insulted.
The carnival barking here is useless.
The overturning of the Roe v. Wade decision is all you need to know to realize him being anywhere near the Supreme Court would have been catastrophic.
The vote was 6-3 to overturn, Roberts went along but wrote an opinion that he was not totally on board with the decision.
If Garland was on the court, the vote would have been 5-4 at that point, would Roberts have voted to overturn Roe ??
Based on his Obamacare decision, he would have voted 5-4 to keep Roe v. Wade IMO.
Hopefully, Garland will be gone in a couple of years, on the Supreme Court he’s there for 30 years probably causing an untold amount of damage.