Replies

No the machines were not part of it. At first I thought this, but understanding what I know now, I don’t believe it. I am aware of the audit. I’m aware of the results of the audit which, to the disappointment of many, did not support any of the claims which so many have hung their hat on.

I also looked into Dr Shiva’s data and charts which at first is a bit interesting, but I found a group which went over and QA’d his methodology. It was complicated but they reverse engineered his method step by step and found the fallacy he used. They even went backward and looked at Biden vs straight blue and found no difference. Details aren’t important but it was enough that I now ignore that.

The Dominion software is probably crap. The bits and pieces I saw on videos from election offices (like in Ga) demonstrating it told me it’s old. I heard the statements about ports open and what not. While this isn’t trivial, to “hack” and change things around during transactions, against that software and DB, is really over the top. So is doing it programmatically. Ive developed standalone and cloud based systems using Oracle, SQL Server and DB2. What some are saying happened I no longer accept as possible in the given environments, based on what is known now. Yes they had “issues” but those were not tied to transactions. The software is so old, it’s written in an old framework, Dominion fought examination to save their ass from other things that would be exposed. Namely, wtf would anyone pay that kinda of money for that. So I’m saying the software was crap, but it wasn’t vote flipping and stuff. I’m no longer convinced of that.

The hand recounts that were done that I am aware of did not show abuse of admin adjudication. If there is one out there that did, I would like to see that.

Some claim was made about 60% errors on a server. Anyone who looks through server logs will see “errors”. It can be the same one repeated over and over. But what an “error” is is not what we think and “error” is. But log files do contain errors - that’s where they live. And if you run older framework software on certain OS’s, you will see errors. People spend forever trying to resolve each one when it’s really a matter of changing the logging. And all “errors” are not bad, some have nothing to do with software.

I saw a few interviews with Dominion people. I’ve worked with smart people. What I saw, they aren’t smart enough to concoct something like this. They were all about CYA. That’s a red herring.

One of the guys who was leading the charge actually screwed up mixing results from two different states. I forgot his name, he was with some security group, but i looked into him and not impressed with him either.

I looked at results and trends myself, because I saw these teams trying to explain what happened and they did a terrible job. You could see it on the faces of the committee members. I’m afraid those guys didn’t do anything to actually help. In some cases, they made things worse because the “theories” they presented from their data and charts meant nothing.

I believe all of this noise was allowed to propagate and spread to conceal and obfuscate the facts of the real fraud, which was ballot harvesting on steroids. Officials everywhere have never been under this scrutiny before, and the heightened sense of awareness really spooked them. Georgia is a great example. Three counties around Atlanta seemed to break the mold seen for the last 20 years. One county pulled in something like 30% more ballots this time. From where? That’s what needs to be focused on.

So yes, if I’m some election official somewhere, I want everyone talking about vote flipping, hacks and software because I don’t want them looking into how I address chain of custody. That will change for Georgia by the next election. I can’t speak for other states.