RE: if the jury found him not guilty of rape, doesn’t mean they thought she perjured herself?
The Jury verdict really makes little logical sense to me.
Firstly, E. Jean Carrol does not remember the date ( even the year ) when it occured.
Secondly, there were no eyewitnesses even to Trump being in the place where she alleged they went in together.
Thirdly, Even if the rape did occur ( doubtful ), why didn’t she SCREAM? Report it to security?
Fourthly, The Jury decided that it was NOT rape ( as opposed to her testimony ), but decided sexual assault did occur.... HOW DID THEY DETERMINE THAT? Her accusation was NOT just sexual assault, it was RAPE. They did not believe the RAPE accusation, yet, decided a sexual assault occured?
It’s Just bizzare how they made this weird verdict.
The jury most likely came from New York County (Manhattan) and Bronx County, and on the political spectrum, most likely ranged from liberal to communist. They know the plaintiff did not prove her rape case, but they hate Trump so much that they had to find him liable for something, and so they made up the sexual assault just to stick it to him.