The testimony of any witness is suffice to prove any point of believed by the jury. The appellate court does NOT weigh the evidence. The starting point of the appellate analysis begins with the principle that the judgment is presumed to be correct and legal error by the trial court has to be affirmatively shown.
I know there are some concerns regarding interim rulings by the judge, but I can’t say I’ve studied the case and know what they are. That the jury did not find liability on the most serious allegation sets this judgment in concert. It will not be disturbed on appeal
Damn the media. In all the years I’ve paid attention never once have I heard media explain just how tough a road appeal is. I think the general population thinks an appeal is just a chance for a mulligan.
Nothing could be farther from accurate. If appealed,
I’d bet ten thousand bucks this verdict gets upheld
How in the world can it be upheld? Because she can’t remember or give a specific date or even year, that nullifys Trump’s ability to mount a defense. He cannot provide exculpatory evidence.