I’m confused here. He was cleared of rape, but somehow is still forced to pay the claimant millions of dollars? Is this another leftie-like-logic (ie no logic at all) mind-bender of ....kinda/sorta guilty but not completely?
It makes no sense. She was either lying completely about the rape...ergo it didn’t happen, and therefore deserves NO payment....or not. What the hell?
He was found liable of sexual battery, not rape, and defamation. Total awarded damages of 5 million.