Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

Pfizer- for all those revenues from these “products” had NO:

Liability exposure under the EUA for most of the forced application of the “vaccines” (which are not and never have been vaccines).

No investment in the creation of the “vaccines”. US govt. subsidized the entire formulation, manufacture and even distribution. Pfizer was out ZERO dollars.

The 56 billion is therefore pure profit with no liabilities or expenses other than their labor expense which is deducted in the full corporate statements for worldwide employees. With the exception of Executive Compensation which is exempt salary plus bookoodles bonus and benefits- mined from the employee individual insurance which the company takes out on each employee. Complete cost shifting.

Whaaaaa, wahhh, whaaaa goes the whine. In reality they cashed in and continued their “partnership” with Government entities who are NOT under legal exposure what so ever.

Criminal globalists who GOT IT WRONG!!


5 posted on 05/02/2023 8:26:26 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John S Mosby
No investment in the creation of the “vaccines”. US govt. subsidized the entire formulation, manufacture and even distribution. Pfizer was out ZERO dollars.

Who told you that? It's wrong.

Pfizer refused any Warp Speed money for development or production and funded it themselves.

All they got from the government was a purchase agreement where we guaranteed to buy 300 million doses if Pfizer was successful in developing a vaccine and getting it approved.

Moderna and some other firms did take Warp Speed money for development, but not Pfizer.

11 posted on 05/02/2023 8:47:17 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson