Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: semimojo
--- "Do you think the CDC or the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are purposely misrepresenting the numbers? That's your implication so if you believe it say so."

Your parade of questions is amusing. I will write simply, for you. "So."

But that is not my "implication." That is my assertion. It is backed by the early 16 April 2020 WHO publication "INTERNATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR CERTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION (CODING) OF COVID-19 AS CAUSE OF DEATH",

Source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/10186/10693286/COD_WHO_Annex.pdf

Read it. It shows, complete with arrows on entry lines in death reports how to enhance the "visibility" (a recent parlance of the Biden administration in other areas) of Covid-19 as a diagnosis and cause of death. From the get go, the heightening of the "data" has been part and parcel of the "event."

And yet, after forty months of official data, the mortality rate remains a tiny 0.084 percent. The WHO first said it would be 3.4 percent. That was a guess. Imperial College's Ferguson was even more wildly wrong. Also just guessing. And now Johns Hopkins is no longer even posting to their "Coronavirus Resource Center." As to your inane questions about how agencies and individuals can participate in something ethically and factually wrong, one only need recall that entire nations have gone to war, as did the Axis powers which included European nations along with Japan and groups of collaborators within nations like the Vichy, Croatian Muslims, Ukrainian Nazis and more. So "why haven't any of the tens of thousands of public health professionals involved spilled the beans" proves itself inane. CARES dropped $30K per dying or dead ventilated, remdesivir-addled patient, and MANY "public health professionals" have been "spilling the beans" as articles posted to this Free Republic demonstrate. So....

While you think me not willing to state the obvious, I will assert that you haven't seen the obvious. Or refuse it. The WHO 16 April 2020 PDF is yours to look through, if you want to. You too can heighten the "visibility" of Covid, as you do posing questions to which you might already have an answer you dislike.

I assert the "event" was a con. You apparently cannot fathom this for reasons all your own, as you seem to defend the WHO and Fauci, CDC and other agencies, the mRNA manufacturers and more. Read "The Real Anthony Fauci." I have. Then get back to me with your defense of Moderna and Pfizer-BionTech products.

99 posted on 04/30/2023 4:55:29 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Worldtraveler once upon a time
I assert the "event" was a con.

If this is all about misclassification of deaths what do you think caused the estimated 1.2 million excess deaths during the pandemic?

Or are you going to reject this evidence too?

100 posted on 04/30/2023 5:17:08 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson