[DiogenesLamp]

Now YOUR position seems to be that one can only be on FreeRepublic if you believe that the election was stolen — even though even the guy who claims it was stolen can’t find anyone who can validate his claim. Think about that. A billionaire. Virtually unlimited resources. Can hire whoever he wants. And still can’t find anyone to validate his claim.

If a guy doesn't *WANT* to find evidence of fraud, he won't find evidence of fraud. I argue with a lot of people. When they don't want to see something, they just won't see it.

You want evidence? Here's the evidence!

https://hereistheevidence.com/

Don't want to look at it? I won't be surprised.

[unclebankster]

We use a secret ballot in this country, so the rigging is built into the system.

An honest system would have a name and address on the ballot, but the voter would still be able to check the boxes in the privacy of a voting booth.

All mailed ballots should have a name & address on the ballot as well.

[Wallace T.]

Consider the source of this article: the Washington Post, a house organ of the Washington establishment for many decades. Its credibility is on a par with Joe Isuzu or an old time snake oil salesman. Who is this firm that issued the no fraud opinion, who owns them, and who are the executives?

Anybody who accepts the information on an unquestioning basis in the Washington Post article is blue pilled.

[bigdaddy45]

I did in fact. I have a general rule. If your web site is filled with typos, I lose interest pretty fast. It tells me you’re sloppy and don’t pay attention to detail. And it really hurts credibility.