Your reflexive reaction to any dissent from your personal tastes or beliefs is to take it as a personal afront. You could have presented instances of Tucker Carlson’s profound insights, but instead you write “flame”.
The criticisms that I mentioned are valid criticisms. But I still love Trump and still watch Gutfeld, because despite their obvious flaws as public speakers, they have something to say. They do not “trigger” me any more than you do.
This is why I cannot engage with you, and present instances of Tucker’s shallowness, because it’s a waste of time. You’re an intellectual gelding (now THAT is a personal affront, for your future references, NOT disagreeing with another or critiquing their heroes). The only difference between you and a left wing snowflake who still treasures his ‘participation trophies’ from kindergarten is that you purport to have conservative values. I’ll take your word for it. But you’re still an intellectual gelding. Read WB Yeats, Leaders of the Crowd.
I remain, “shallowly” yours,
E5
‘bye.
U wanted flame
I showed you flames.
Maybe I’ll read your new screeds tamorra.
*boring*