Reading her words rather than the interpretation by people, she’s talking about the evolution of the virus. New variants appeared and rendered invalid previous scientific evaluation of virus behavior.
The vaccine data was measured in the original clinical trials and those trials were challenged by the original virus. It was replaced by the alpha variant, and of course, the eventual much more deadly delta variant. In fact, there was mention in the clinical trials, particularly for J&J, that the samples being used from multiple countries risked that the virus variant types in the measurements would vary, because variants appeared at different times in different countries.
There is nothing in her words that warrants this running around waving hands over heads.
Reasoned analysis like that won’t fly. This is a hair on fire zone.
” New variants appeared and rendered invalid previous scientific evaluation of virus behavior.”
Lies. Why are you so comfortable, so supportive of her lies?
The PFizer/Moderna trial documents submitted to the FDA stated that the they did not evaluate whether or not the ‘vaccines’ reduced transmission.
She made a sickening commercial encouraging pregnant women to get vaccinated.
Fauci/Walensky et. al. never had any scientific evidence to suggest that the ‘vaccines’ halt transmission. Now she lies and says they did halt transmission, at first, before ‘evolution’ of the virus!
From the start, this process has been intentional deceitful: it never should have been up to the public to ‘prove’ the vaccines don’t work in order to escape totalitarian mandates. The burden of proof was always on the CDC to prove they did work. They had no evidence, they concealed proof they don’t work, and they sneered the public was ‘unscientific’ and ‘selfish’ for not wanting experimental ‘shots’ without informed consent or a shred of evidence that they were actually ‘safe and effective’.