Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CreviceTool
Once again, it is not Fox that is defending against this action - it is the insurance carriers. Just the same as your automobile insurance carrier defending you in a fender bender. The carrier(s) reserves the right to use its discretion in bringing the matter to a conclusion within the coverage limits. If the settlement is greater than the coverage limits, then it falls to the insured to weigh in ...

So, wouldn't FOX have attorneys working with the insurance company ones right along?

Say, FOX had a 1/2 billion policy, so would be willing to part with 387 million to settle.

133 posted on 04/18/2023 3:48:52 PM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]


To: gloryblaze

When engaging in major litigation like this, the first thing plaintiff’s counsel wants to know is the insurance carriers and the coverage limits if possible, that way you know the table stakes out the gate.

You also want the defendant’s legal team to wet their beaks (read: billing lots of hours to the carriers) in order to soften them up for a potential settlement within the coverage limit, so the plaintiff doesn’t have to come into the picture with their corporate and hired legal firepower.

It not like the Fox insurance underwritten legal team is taking a loss - heck, they billed a ton of hours and settled the matter quietly under the coverage limit. Everybody is happy and Fox will have to live with dramatically higher insurance costs.


175 posted on 04/18/2023 6:38:29 PM PDT by CreviceTool (A Good Samaritan with a handgun saved my life...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson