McGregor’s report attributed the Election Day failures to older printers being unable to maintain heat levels necessary to print ballots dark enough to be read by on-site tabulators
and the length and thickness of the ballots causing the printers to fail.
Wasn’t there some kind of question about supposedly counterfeit ballots with incorrect dimensions and unofficial origin?
Just axin
“...older printers being unable to maintain heat levels necessary to print ballots dark enough to be read by on-site tabulators”
Did you write “This part sounds reasonable.” Are you NUTS? The whole system should have been tested, retested, and challenged in every way possible. Then tested some more. Those sort of problems should have been uncovered MONTHS before the election.
There is nothing “reasonable” about any of these lame excuses.
It was all intentional designed to steal the election from Lake. Even if they failed to do the necessary testing early enough, THAT was intentional, too. Somebody knew these older printers wouldn’t work. Why did they suddenly just happen to have these problems all at once in the 2022 election? Were there no hints of these types of failures in previous elections?
The whole election stinks to high heaven.
Going back a long time.
We had small dot-matrix printers with 3-part carbonless paper used to print receipts. A new wing was opened to the existing building, but the AC guys screwed up and left a vent to the roof open in that section. This was N.FL and the humidity was sky high. The 3-part paper swelled up due to high humidity and jammed in all the printers, every single time the clerks tried to print anything. So yes, printers and scanners are very sensitive to problems with paper.