Posted on 04/07/2023 3:56:31 AM PDT by tlozo
Thanks for commenting, before reading article, as no one has accused Rand Paul of being a "Chinese agent".
The government is already doing it.
FB does everything TiK Tok does
This bill sucks. That great Republican Senator Thune (disappointment in greek I think) is a cosponsor — need I say more.?
Yes. Difference is that Tiktok is owned by the Chinese. That's why Tiktok is banned on all federal government-owned devices.
You sir are OBTUSE - No, the debate is NOT about banning TickityTok.
The Debate is about the new law proposed by the UNIPARTY and they are using TickittyTock as the COVER story for the Dumb amongst us.
Yes, that would be you
“Debate is whether Tiktok should be banned. Ron Paul says he is against banning Tiktok, before the bill was presented.”
And there is the Freudian slip. The deep set hate for Ron Paul is driving you to also hate his son Rand Paul.
As a Paultard I can tell you with authority that both Ron and Rand have always opposed banning ANY free speech on ANY platform and in ANY form their whole careers.
Protecting free speech without compromise is what the Pauls have ALWAYS done.
Once again, Ron Paul is against banning Tiktok, period. No matter what bill is written, even if it exclusively bans only Tiktok.
Sorry, being older I just remember Ron more than Rand.
I had hoped that you were simply obtuse.
Now I will have to assume you are a Commy FBI agent who, with time on your hands, having had the experience of working in D.C as one of the J6 provacoturs, has decided to do additional instigation on this site.
Were your daddy and granddaddy KGB operatives, is this where you learned how to be so obtuse?
Thanks for the enlightening debate.
Yikes!
“Sorry, being older I just remember Ron more than Rand.”
Of course, that is exactly what I stated. And it has made your judgment Pre-biased.
Before I knew Jeff Yass was funding the Paul’s, I noted how Paul’s argument was not consistent with his normally logical and fact based arguments.
That article is deceptively titled for sure.
This legislation that Senator Paul is opposing is just more Patriot Act and FISA court stuff.
We should be getting rid of bad laws, not making more bad laws.
I think most of you know what I mean.
Before I knew Jeff Yass was funding the Paul’s, I noted how Paul’s argument was not consistent with his normally logical and fact based arguments.
*****************************
I hear ya.... Oh wait. How is he being illogical and inconsistent? Because you jumped the shark with your claim.
I guess you have a blind spot, and we would like to help you see it. (Or maybe you can help us see ours?)
So you think Paul opposes the bill because the Chinese pay them. I don’t believe the Pauls are paid Chinese agents. They had the same public position since Nixon was president.
I ha e read a breakdown of what this law will empower the Feds to do. The law is a vast over reach and gives blanket powers to the Feds. Vast Deep State over reach — tagging it after the TikTok hearings was just an excuse. Hooray for Rand Paul even if I’m not a Libertarian Paul supporter
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.