Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top General Suggests Administration Would Tolerate Iran Having Nuclear Weapons
Foundation for Defense of Democracies ^ | March 24, 2023 | Andrea Stricker

Posted on 03/24/2023 7:28:46 PM PDT by lasereye

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark A. Milley, said at a congressional hearing on Thursday that the United States “remains committed, as a matter of policy, that Iran will not have a fielded nuclear weapon.” This statement, as well as a similar comment by Milley last September, suggests the Biden administration is prepared to tolerate nuclear weapons in Iran’s hands, provided the weapon is not “fielded” — that is — deployed.

At the Thursday hearing of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, Gen. Milley warned, “We, the United States military, have developed multiple options for our national leadership to consider if or when Iran ever decides to develop an actual nuclear weapon.” Yet his reference to “a fielded nuclear weapon” introduced uncertainty about whether America would use force to stop Iran from breaking out of its nonproliferation commitments and producing one or more nuclear weapons.

The Wall Street Journal reported late Thursday that a National Security Council spokeswoman told the paper, “the United States is committed to never allowing Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon.” However, she did not explicitly repudiate Milley’s comment.

A shift in U.S. strategy from one of nuclear weapons denial to one of preventing their deployment — but not their production — would reflect a major policy departure. President Joe Biden has said repeatedly that the United States will “never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon” on his watch. Former President Trump insisted, “Iran will never be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.” Former President Obama declared, “Iran will never be permitted to develop a nuclear weapon.”

In his testimony, Milley also warned, “Iran could produce fissile material for a nuclear weapon in less than two weeks and it would only take several more months to produce an actual nuclear weapon.”

While the estimate of two weeks to produce fissile material echoes other recent statements by Department of Defense officials, Milley’s warning potentially reflects a newly reduced estimate of the time it would take Tehran to fashion a nuclear explosive device. The United States and Israel have typically estimated Iran would need at least a year to accomplish weaponization of nuclear material. Moreover, the U.S. intelligence community assessed in February that Iran had not resumed past nuclear weaponization work. However, the Institute for Science and International Security has estimated that due to Tehran’s past nuclear weapons work, it could explode a crude nuclear device within six months.

Tehran is too close to the nuclear threshold for mixed American messages. As of February, it had enough enriched uranium to produce weapons-grade uranium (WGU) for an estimated five nuclear weapons within three months and could make enough WGU for an additional two weapons soon after. Moreover, such a U.S. policy shift would be dangerous because the regime in Tehran may see it as a green light to move toward nuclear weapons production.

If U.S. policy remains unchanged, then the White House should explicitly correct Milley’s comments. The administration should make clear that the United States is prepared to use force should Tehran attempt to produce atomic bombs.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; milley; nuclear
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: lasereye
"In his testimony, Milley also warned, “Iran could produce fissile material for a nuclear weapon in less than two weeks and it would only take several more months to produce an actual nuclear weapon.”

Same as saying "Iran has a nuke, and it happened on Biden's watch."

41 posted on 03/25/2023 12:26:02 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
The mere idea Iran doesn't have a nuke is absurd.

Pakistan transferred their nuke capacity in toto to the Norks in the span of a decade nearly 20 years ago, and yet somehow Iran doesn't have a nuke in all this time? Bullshit.

What needs to happen, is first, WSJ prints the Pulitzer piece that acknowledges Iran has the bomb.

Second, Jim Jordan's Committee immediately subpoenas Lurch and sweats him for days plural.

"How long has Iran had the bomb, MR. KERRY? The WSJ says Iran has had a functional nuclear device since December 2020. When you were made aware that Iran had the bomb during the plandemic, who did you disclosed this information to? Why didn't you share this information with Congress?"

42 posted on 03/25/2023 12:33:40 PM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Benedict Biden’s ATF Form 4473 now has THREE options for the gun buyer’s sex! UNBELIEVABLE!


43 posted on 03/30/2023 4:15:32 PM PDT by 2harddrive (https://rumble.com/vdptuf-best-election-fraud-video-ever-unmasked-have-we-uncovered-the-truth-about)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson