Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rolls-Royce to build nuclear reactor for the Moon with UK funding
The Jerusalem Post ^ | March 20, 2023 | Staff

Posted on 03/20/2023 8:15:00 AM PDT by Twotone

The UK Space Agency is backing a plan by British car and engine manufacturing firm Rolls-Royce to build a nuclear reactor for the Moon.

The program will receive funds to the sum of £2.9 million from the UK Space Agency, a major increase from the £249,000 study funded by the agency in 2022.

It is hoped that Rolls-Royce will have the reactor ready to send to the Moon by 2029.

The idea to make a nuclear power source for the Moon is far from outlandish.

Nations all over the world, spearheaded by NASA's Artemis missions, seek to return humanity to the Moon for a more prolonged stay than the few brief visits during the Apollo missions in the late 1960s and 1970s.

The first steps for this have already been taken, with NASA's Artemis I Mission having successfully returned from a trip around the Moon and the Artemis III Mission set to put human boots on the lunar surface for the first time in decades.

This is only the start of what is hoped to be a more long-term human presence on the Moon, which would include humans living and working on the lunar surface. This has the potential to vastly transform human progress, with space having been referred to by some as the "ultimate laboratory."

(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: moon; nuclearreactor; rollsroyce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: The Pack Knight

Solar lacks the power-load advantages that you get with either fossil fueled power or nuclear power. Solar requires a very large “footprint” to obtain a tiny fraction of the power load that either a fossil fueled power generator or a tiny nuclear power plant can produce.

Also, with no magnetosphere, as the earth has, and not atmosphere, as the earth has, solar arrays will be subject to degradation from all the charged particles that reach the moons surface. A problem with significantly smaller impact on an underground placed nuclear power plant.

The environment out in space also has several hazards that could cause damage to the solar panels. These include space debris and extreme solar radiation, which could degrade the solar panels up to 8 times faster than panels installed on Earth.


21 posted on 03/20/2023 8:47:40 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Refer to the mess around and you’ll find out chart.


22 posted on 03/20/2023 8:57:49 AM PDT by gibsonguy (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana

It’s likely the old Allison Engine Division. Located in Indianapolis. Now known as RR North America.

Golbalism, yuh know?


23 posted on 03/20/2023 9:00:27 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jiim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
When the Spanish crown first sent out exploration ships, none of them went to the North Pole. There was nothing there of value. So any such expedition would be a waste of money.

I struggle to see how the Moon is any different.

Helium 2 (he2) is abundant on the Moon and would be the ideal fuel for fusion reactors. If Fusion Reactors are ever developed the ability to mine he2 would be worth trillions and trillions of dollars.

24 posted on 03/20/2023 9:17:17 AM PDT by MichaelRDanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MichaelRDanger

Now that’s interesting. Thanks for the reply.


25 posted on 03/20/2023 9:20:18 AM PDT by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MichaelRDanger
Plus everybody could walk around talking like Alvin.
26 posted on 03/20/2023 9:33:36 AM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Twotone

They need solar and windmills.


27 posted on 03/20/2023 9:37:17 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zathras

Why not a LFTR ?


28 posted on 03/20/2023 9:40:55 AM PDT by absalom01 (You should do your duty in all things. You cannot do more, and you should never wish to do less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Strip Malls, huh?

We will have to send customers, some to shop and some to wander around and rob the paying customers.


29 posted on 03/20/2023 9:42:15 AM PDT by Scrambler Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Zathras
"Something based on Pu238 is the only thing that would work."

Not so. Highly enriched U-235 will also work nicely.

30 posted on 03/20/2023 10:28:17 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Not Responding to Seagull Snark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

INL ( Idaho National Laboratory) the nations nuclear energy research lab and home of the first breeder reactor , EBR1 (see Atomic City) and still operating, is working with private industry to develop manufacturing of new generation (Gen4) MMR's (Micro Modular Reactors).

There is a YouTube video out "The MARVEL Microreactor at INL".

Much of the advancement is related to the study of fuel pellet decay characteristics using the immersion (3D) program developed at INL called MOOSE, (which is also used to study fault line characteristics among other things).

Russia has several microreactors, including a new system that is barge-mounted and producing heat and electricity for an arctic community across the Bering Strait from Alaska.

31 posted on 03/20/2023 10:35:43 AM PDT by existtoexcel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelRDanger

I think you mean He3...


32 posted on 03/20/2023 10:38:11 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (Not Responding to Seagull Snark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

You are correct...


33 posted on 03/20/2023 10:51:50 AM PDT by MichaelRDanger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: V_TWIN

If you look at the inventory of active satellites, almost two-thirds (4868 out of 7572, 64.3%) are U.S. flagged, some are Russian, in fact most dead (inactive) satellites, like Cosmos 2251 which collided with U.S. owned Iridium 33, are Russian (5649 out of 8780). The next biggest countries are the UK and China, but the UK is a leader per capita, if you exclude dead Russian satellites. Number 3 in live payloads. Russia is just cluttering orbits with junk.

Country / On Orbit / Active / % Active

Russia (CIS) / 5868 / 219 / 3.7%

USA / 5151 / 4868 / 94.5%

China (PRC) / 4397 / 668 / 15.2%

UK / 652 / 613 / 94.0%

https://celestrak.org/satcat/boxscore.php

U.S. and Britain have 14.8 and 12.9 active satellites per million people, respectively. Very respectable.


34 posted on 03/20/2023 11:28:45 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight
If there is anywhere solar ought to work, it is a body with no atmosphere. They could even place solar panels at points near the lunar north pole that receive sunlight 80-100% of the lunar year.

The rotational axis of the Moon precesses with the same rate as its orbital plane, but is 180° out of phase (see Cassini's Laws). Therefore, the angle between the ecliptic and the lunar equator is always 1.543°, even though the rotational axis of the Moon is not fixed with respect to the stars. Every 29.53 (earth days) at the lunar poles (pick one) the sun would move from 1.543 degrees above the horizon to the same amount below. The angular diameter of the sun is the same on average at the moon as on earth, about half a degree, so the poles are in utter darkness much of the time, and the solar panels would have to rotate to follow the sun around the horizon the rest of the time.

35 posted on 03/20/2023 11:41:52 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson