Prosecutors argue that he violated a New York law which prohibits falsifying business records when he marked a $130,000 payment to Daniels as ‘legal expenses.’
Is that what this is all about? This whole legal investigation and possible prosecution of Trump, is about the accountants recording a “legal settlement” or “non disclosure agreement” as a “legal expense”, rather than as a “legal settlement”??? Am I reading this correctly?
The payment was part of a legal agreement being made between the parties involved. Are we really trying to say, that the wording of the type of expense in financial reporting is an issue with requires a trial in a courtroom, with a judge and jury, to settle issues surrounding how we describe the title of an expenditure????
You nailed it. It is a craven act to incarcerate a political foe. The FBI and DOJ are wanting another January 6th.