UPDATE: Biden Regime Confirms Commitment To “Legally-Binding” Agreement Which Will Surrender U.S. Pandemic Authority To Chinese-Backed World Health Organization “For Generations To Come”

Gateway Pundit ^ | 3/2/2023 | Cullen Linebarger

[LoveMyFreedom]

Wake Up America!!!!!

[King_Corey]

Meh, I will not comply. Come get some Feds.

[lgjhn23]

FJB

[House Atreides]

Stand up America to this TREASONOUS ACTION.

[brownsfan]

“Wake Up America!!!!!”

Too late. Most don’t know, or don’t care, but they do know what prince Harry is whining about.

[2banana]

Legally binding???

That would be a treaty and needs 2/3 of the senate to approve.

Anything else has no legal authority.

[circlecity]

This will go straight to the Supreme Court. Which is why the left will not try to enforce it until they get control of the court.

[Skwor]

Only binding to Biden, any sitting president at the time can revoke it at a whim. Now we just need to get an American loving president in office.

[conservativeimage]

I do not consent to some election thief mafioso contracting on my behalf.
It is an unconscionable contract.
It may be “legal” but is not lawful.

[bk1000]

I will not comply. Nobody cares, and it won’t accomplish much more than an inconvenience to me, but if enough of us refuse to comply it might make a difference. I refuse to succumb to any foreign group. (Well, maybe the Swedish Bikini Team, but that’s about it ;-)

[conservativeimage]

If Biden wants to hand cuff his own balls to a silverback gorilla fine but I’ll have no part of it.
I am under God’s law not man’s law and I will defend myself violently if necessary.

[usurper]

I don't care what the stupid peace of paper says. Its not binding on me of future administrations.

What is the WHO going to do when we tell them to pound sand? I view this as a nothing burger.

[C210N]

It may be “legally” binding, but it can in no way be LAWFULLY binding. And, certainly not CONSTITUTIONALLY binding.

Legal is not Lawful; lawful is not legal.

[conservativeimage]

Any law that harms is unlawful.

[Blurb2350]

Putin just nullified the Start treaty. (Watch for Russian nukes to make their appearance in the Western hemisphere. Their defense minister is in Venezuela to discuss “cooperation.”) Similarly, a non-traitorous American president can nullify this WHO monstrosity.

[whitney69]

This is interesting as health and wellness is still, by Constitution, the responsibilities of state’s rights, not federal law. This is how Roe was destroyed after too many years of blinding.

wy69

[Bob434]

If one president can “legally” bind us to so etching like that without approval of congress, and claim that it will be “binding for decades”, then the next president can legally unbind us “for decades to come” without congressional approval

[Eleutheria5]

This would be a Treaty within the meaning of the Constitution, and would have to be ratified. Won’t happen.

[LouAvul]

That old fool is pulling a Clinton, viz. trading America's future for hard cash from the chinks. And everyone who's name is on the RAT voter registration rolls, is ok with it.

[Boardwalk]

All part of the great reset.