I haven’t seen evidence of that and Trump’s team has never even claimed fraud where it matters - in court - but I guess I could be convinced.
Every time they’ve been given that chance in a venue where their answer had consequences they say no fraud, just irregularities. Their statements to the media don’t convince me.
I think there was sloppy administration in places and maybe procedural problems but nothing illegal that could have changed the outcome.
Can it be proven?
Since it’s been over 2 years and we still don’t even have a formal claim of fraud, I doubt it, but we’ll see.
The burden of proof is on those alleging fraud.
I find it amusing that people believe that any of these news channels are even capable of anything investigative. They are talking heads. Period.
They rip news reports off the wires and re-write them (sometimes.). If you flip between the channels you will hear the same story, written the same way, using the same language. People doing that are not conducting deep investigations.
Expecting your favorite news reader to do anything more than reading the news and inject an occasional side comment is silly.
The ONLY people doing any news gathering are a bunch of producers working for peanuts—usually with a hangover. They are lazy and not really “aggressive.” This is true in every newsroom at that level.
Re: 38 - Once Mike Lindell makes the packet captures public, it will all come into focus.
Maybe.
Okay, no.
Mike, we’ve been waiting for over two years for you to back up your claims. Stop jackassin’ and make the packet captures public.