wor wrote: “What’s your point? You continue to be selective and post only on these articles but avoid all the factual studies posted recently about the damage the clot shot and mask mandates have caused.”
There have been no ‘factual studies’ showing extensive wide spread damange from the vaccine. The ones you linked do not show what you claimed. For example, one of your links says the vaccine mandates didn’t work because they were city level mandates which were easily evaded. Then there is the link to the Expose.
FYI, I’ve never advocated or supported mask mandates or social distancing. I’ve posted many times about the absurdity of mask mandates. My favorite was that persons seated at the bar could be unmasked yet persons standing next to them had to be masked.
There have been no factual studies linking to the clot shot effectiveness. You are constantly dodging the subject, there are numerous studies questioning the efficacy and even safety of the shot, but you still claim it is both safe and effective.
You claim is saved countless lives but even Pfizer has admitted it was never tested for stopping transmission and never stated it prevents covid, only it can reduce how ill it may make a patient.
So now I ask you, how exactly “do you and was it” tested for making you less ill!
The shot absolutely causes heart damage, that was even shown in the Pfizer studies, the issue is to what extent and that keeps getting censored as the powers do not wish that discussed.
Ok, then explain the rise in excessive deaths after the clot-shot (its not a vaccine) was mandated.