Posted on 02/17/2023 8:34:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
CatHerd,
I appreciate your passion, and your skill, at both research and debate.
My question is, if you are un-vaxxed yourself, why would you be so passionate in your campaign to discredit Ms. Wolf?
No bigger issues of concern out there? And no concern about the vaccines, or how we were misled about their effectiveness, at all?
Weren’t the lies claiming that the vaccines stopped the spread of covid, 1000x more dangerous and damaging than any lies Ms. Wolf may or may not have spread, simply based on how they were echoed by so many?
Golden Eagle
That’s why my daughters you and very vaxxed friends (all young physicians that recently finished training) are popping out healthy babies like rabbits.
I have explained and explained that. Until I am quite tired of it.
Not my best explanation, but handy, as it was on the same thread where I debunked Naomi’s batty claims about the vaccines supposedly causing 44% of pregnant women to miscarry:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4086071/posts?page=206#206
“Technically a ‘doctor,’ but misleading in the context of a medical story.”
Those of us who pay attention to her reports and the research done by the team know that she’s not a medical doctor; she never says or implies that she is. Often, she will say, “I’m not a medical doctor...”
That’s very funny! Thanks for posting.
Why “Geesh”? She’s not a medical doctor.
Hubby is a Dr. (Physicist). Is he not allowed to comment regarding medical subjects? Or investigate/research? Research was his career.
Thanks for the logic. There are people here who have paid attention to this issue, and people who haven’t. Those who haven’t are quick to do the “standard snarking”.
“I believe Covid wasn’t the bioweapon, the shot is.”
The clot shot existed before Covid did. They had to introduce Covid to rationalize pulling out the legit bio-weapon.
That in no way answered my questions. It appeared to be a collection of insults, primarily, but nestled within was your insistence that you are anti-mandate.
OK great. But being anti-mandate means you are actually in strong agreement with Ms. Wolf on that important aspect of this discussion, does it not?
So back to my questions.
Why are you so passionate in your determination to discredit Ms. Wolf? You just admitted you completely agree with her on one of her main issues which is being opposed to the mandates.
And wouldn’t any assertions by Ms. Wolf that may have been incorrect, be rather insignificant in the grand scheme of coronavirus misinformation when compared to the entire government and medical establishment lies that the vaccines were not only safe, but effectively prevented transmission?
In light of these interesting contradictions, ‘ll add another question, is there a chance that you have another gripe with Ms. Wolf, regarding some of her other areas of supposed expertise? And if so, why would you only focus on her comments vis a vis the vaccines?
Thanks.
I didn’t listen to what she said at all because she’s a communist feminist. It’s of no importance whether she agrees with me or no on a single issue. Her worldview is wrong, even if she’s got one thing right.
Great posts as usual! Hope you are having a super day!
Wonderful! Two ways!
Same to you, dear FRiends!
I have massive respect for your Physicist husband, and he most certainly deserves to call himself "Doctor". I would be very interested in hearing his comments regarding medical issues.
But a person with a PhD in *English Literature*, commenting on medical subjects? Kind of like "Doctor" Jill Biden, IMO.
It's true, anyone who earned a PhD in any subject can rightfully call themselves "doctor". But those "doctor" designations sure aren't equivalent...
In my opinion, and likely others, there may be some additional level of reverence given to "medical" doctors, but after what we've just seen happen over the last 2 years, whatever additional level there may have been, was sabotaged severely by those doctors, themselves.
Yet, many of these doubters trust the FRoctors.
🙃
Aren’t you due for another booster of an experimental “vaccine” that they admit doesn’t stop infection or transmission and actually increases it?
What are you waiting for?
There were no insults at all. I called no names. (Although plenty were slung at me. There’s a faction on here who imagine he who slings the most insults “wins”). And yes, it did explain why I think false claims hurt the anti-mandate cause.
I’m in agreement with her on anti-mandate and not masking children and any other *fact-based* things she is for. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. I am not in agreement with her nutty claims which can easily be debunked.
Why are you so passionate about defending Ms. Wolf? Do you really think her fake claims, hilariously bad math, etc. help the anti-mandate cause? Or elevates discussion of FR? Or do they make her fans look loony? And tarnish the anti-mandate cause?
Why do you think her errors are excused by misinformation from the other side? Is that what you want? A misinformation war? Do you not want truth and facts (and correct math!) on your side? I do. If you’re okay with Naomi’s fake claims, had math, etc., well, it’s a free country.
I commented on her assertions about the vaccines (and not on other subjects she’s spouted about) because that is subject here. That should be obvious. Why don’t you comment about extraneous things? I did comment some of her other nutty claims not related to the vaccines here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4131935/posts?page=58#58
On the subject of critical thinking we agree. It’s critical (🤣).
The key to truth is in being able to look at all sides, especially those that create discomfort.
Another key is to limit intake. Too much thinking, critical or not makes it difficult to come to a reasoned conclusion and clouds issues.
Have a great day 🖖
Huh? Where have I defended Wolf? That's right, nowhere, or minimally. I only noticed your exuberant posts and asked you why the fire was burning so hot, a question you seem extremely uncomfortable with for some reason. Which, therefore, leaves your motives, and proposed principles such as being unvaxxed, in question.
Why are you so passionate about defending Ms. Wolf? Do you really think her fake claims, hilariously bad math, etc. help the anti-mandate cause? Or elevates discussion of FR? Or do they make her fans look loony? And tarnish the anti-mandate cause?
So in a roundabout way, now you're saying you're concerned that Ms. Wolf's potential inaccuracy in reporting, may damage the anti-vaccine cause? Are you inferring that you yourself, have any anti-vaccine credentials of your own, that you can present?
I hope so, I'm just asking a few questions, from someone that certainly appears they should be capable of answering, that's all. Thank you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.