Replies

Credibility is EVERYTHING. When you want people to believe you, even one little “white lie” puts your credibility in the sewer.

Whenever I find out that someone has been less than truthful with me about something, I always wonder about what else they’re telling me that may not be true.

The addition of Smartmatic into the claims of fraud ruined the credibility of the fraud story.

Both Powell and Giuliani made very specific, and very easily debunked statements about Smartmatic. Had they not made such statements, it might be easier to say that their credibility is without question. Their credibility is NOT without question.

1) Smartmatic never worked “with” Hugo Chavez on fixing an election. Smartmatic technology was, in fact, used in the 2017 elections in Venezuela. After it was over, and the Chavez regime claimed the win, Smartmatic called Chavez out for manipulating the results. If Smartmatic were working with Chavez, they would have went along with his scheme instead of calling him a cheater.

So here’s a 2017 news report of Smartmatic calling Chavez a cheater: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-politics-vote-smartmatic-idUSKBN1AI1KZ

The claim Smartmatic makes about NOT working WITH Chavez is therefore verifiable.

(However, the fact that they think Chavez manipulated the machines means that they know that manipulation is possible.)

2) Smartmatic is not owned by Dominion. Dominion is not owned by Smartmatic. Both companies admit that they had a working relationship in the past and that their working relationship ended in litigation. I wasn’t sure how someone might go about verifying company ownership, but... it turns out, there was indeed a law suit.

https://law.justia.com/cases/delaware/court-of-chancery/2013/ca-7844-vcp.html

So unless companies like to spend money suing themselves, it would seem that these companies are not intertwined. I’m not going to call this “verifiable.” It’s verified.

3) In the 2020 Presidential election, Smartmatic software was used in one (!!! THAT’S ONE !!!) county in the United States. That one county was Los Angeles County, California. This, too, is verifiable. Every single county and state has to, by law, publicly divulge what equipment and software is being used in its elections. Therefore, this too is verifiable. (And it makes you wonder why Giuliani and Powell would bring Smartmatic into the story.)

But when Giuliani and Powell brought Smartmatic into the picture, they opened the door for people to question their credibility.

And I will repeat, everything that I have just posted has nothing to do with voting machine reliability. I am merely pointing out that 3 different accusations made (and constantly repeated) by Giuliani and Powell make them look like liars.

As much as I would like for the truths about fraud to come out and be known, I will not put my trust in Powell or Giuliani.

Credibility is everything. Powell and Giuliani ruined the credibility of the the story of fraud every time the used the word “Smartmatic.”