Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jdege
Shooting someone to protect property is not justified.

Of course it is. A robber is trying to deprive you of your sacred rights. By seizing something that is yours without your permission, he is threatening your person. He is substituting his own personal force for morality and the law.

And if he does so openly and in your presence, it's an explicitly violent and tyrannical act. He has put you in the position of either losing your right to what you have earned and bought, or risking your personal safety merely to retain what you own and he does not.

Even 13-year-olds understand this. (Try to take their stuff and watch what happens next.) The handful who defy others' personal property rights are signaling that they are criminally insane, dangerous tyrants without decency, and there is no predicting what they will do next. If they won't desist without being shot, it's sad if they die, but if they insist on invasion, there is no alternative.

52 posted on 01/11/2023 12:26:13 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: SamuraiScot

Giving jdege the benefit of doubt, he probably meant that in D.C. it is not “legally justified”. Note that in Texas, at night, on your own property, it is legally justified.


65 posted on 01/11/2023 1:29:20 PM PST by rmichaelj (Ave Maria gratia plena, Dominus tecum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson