[itsahoot]

“It is worth repeating that ballots that could not be read by the tabulator immediately because of printer settings – or anything else – could be deposited in Door 3 of the tabulator and counted later after duplication by a bipartisan adjudication board.” (page 7)

The key word in that paragraph is could. I suspect the majority of the ballots placed in door 3 Were unreadable by design and required an adjudicator to make a duplicate ballot but as testimony revealed the ballot that was duplicated was not attached to the new ballot. That was a direct violation of election law as were many other practices that this judge chose to ignore.

If you are trying to rationalize this Judge's opinion, sell it somewhere else.

[trustverify0128]

“I suspect.....”

Doesn’t cut it when it comes to overturning an election—according to AZ election law.