To: TigerClaws
the court did not find clear and convincing evidence of the widespread misconduct that Lake had alleged had affected the result of the 2022 general election. Unbelievable.
19 posted on
12/24/2022 12:47:06 PM PST by
McGruff
(Don't underestimate Joe's ability to f*** things up - Barack Obama)
To: McGruff
Unbelievable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On the contrary, it would have been unbelievable had the judge NOT ruled as he did, regardless of how ironclad Kari Lake’s evidence was. Sorry, but that’s just the way the judiciary works in countries controlled by corrupt governments.
111 posted on
12/24/2022 1:52:07 PM PST by
fortes fortuna juvat
(Democrat politicians and voters are dangerous psychopaths. They confirm it everyday.)
To: McGruff
widespread misconductCan the judge define what he means by 'widespread misconduct'?????
Seems to me if only one vote was counted improperly that voter was disenfranchised and the vote count would be bogus!
217 posted on
12/24/2022 6:05:28 PM PST by
eeriegeno
(Checks and balances??? What checks and balances?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson