All of them. He went from questioning their mistakes at first, to being dismayed with their ineptitude, to eventually just just treating them almost if they weren’t even there, they were so ineffective.
One of the obvious examples was, right after they had the computer expert testify that someone must have written a script to change the printer settings. But no effort was ever even made to try to establish who even had the access or knowledge to even make such a change.
You don’t have to be a lawyer to know that’s the very core of the case, I even posted that here myself, saying let’s see those access logs then! But Lake’s team didn’t even ask the question, much less take a deep look. That’s the type of proof you need to win a case like this, so not even pursuing it at all makes no sense.
“after they had the computer expert testify that someone must have written a script to change the printer settings. But no effort was ever even made to try to establish who even had the access or knowledge to even make such a change.”
Exactly!! Only system admins or similar have permissions to do that.
Also, long-hair attorney asked Richer if he had organized a PAC specifically to take down Kari Lake. (He did do that.) Richer answered, “No”. NO FOLLOW-UP! NO EVIDENCE TO DESTROY THE TESTIMONY!! You have to wonder if these guys were working for the other team all the time.