Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John W
"The update passed by the Senate would clarify that the vice president's role in the proceedings is purely ceremonial.

Importantly, the measure also would raise the bar for objecting to a state's slate of electors. As it stands now, it takes just one member of the House and one senator to challenge a state's electors and send both chambers into a potentially days-long debate period, even without legitimate concerns.

The new legislation would raise the threshold for an objection to 20% of the members of each chamber."

The Senate passes election reform designed to head off another Jan. 6 Yeah it's NPR, but I just wanted a summary of what changed and that was the first article that came up.

I don't see this as major changes that affect our democracy. I never bought that Pence had the power to refuse to count certified results from the states.

Congress however does, and changing it from 1 member of each state to 20% of each changer, does raise the bar. But not so much that either party wouldn't be able to mount a challenge.

The real issue is how to ensure that there are controls over the elections, that those laws and controls are followed, that prosecutions occur when they are not, and that states don't certify questionable elections. THAT is what needs to be solved to protect our democracy.

So in my opinion, the election changes do nothing to harm our democracy, but also do nothing to protect it. They do not address what needs to be addressed.

7 posted on 12/23/2022 12:09:07 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DannyTN

I agree with you- but the left loves the headline!!!


10 posted on 12/23/2022 12:37:20 PM PST by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DannyTN

“So in my opinion, the election changes do nothing to harm our democracy, but also do nothing to protect it. They do not address what needs to be addressed.”

Well, the important thing is that they did SOMETHING to prevent another January 6th.

Does this mean we’ll go from January 5th directly to the 7th from now on?


25 posted on 12/23/2022 3:05:06 PM PST by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson