Posted on 12/21/2022 6:41:01 PM PST by grundle
Glad you brought up Antrim County. The population there is relatively sparse and everyone knew right away something was seriously wrong; they immediately audited their results and logged the errors. Dominion machine people were not there; they came flying in ready with tales of fabricated anomalies and agreed to all corrections.
They then quickly locked all their machines in the country and prohibited any auditing of machines. Anyone questioning the validity of the machines was sued for huge $$$.
As far as I know, Antrim County is the only documented forensic study of machine errors in 2020. Dominion, and other similar machines, has not allowed any forensic study of their machines or their software. Antrim County is the only example - and it is damning.
*
Why was there even an option for two different sizes of paper at the printers? Neither size is a standard sheet size. So they had to be custom cut. Why would they cut two sizes an inch different? Why would the wrong size be sent to red districts 4 to 1?
Of course we know why. The democrats cheated as usual. They know they cheated. We know they cheated. They know we know they cheated. And they know they can domit and laugh in our faces and say, “Yeah, so, we cheated, we won, and there’s nothing you can do about it.”
Lovely. Just lovely. So what is going to happen?
Any day...
I know Democrats tend to be thieving, cheating scumbags, but I’m skeptical of headlines that have a lot of ALLCAPS and exclamation points.
As badly as the story is written...makes one wonder if it’s intentional...to keep people confused. Disinformation?
In December 2019, just before America learned of something called “COVID,” Runbeck suddenly had the foresight, premonition, instinct, and urge to order 11 ballot printing and sorting machines.
Or was it inside information that caused Runbeck Election Services to buy these printers, worth millions of dollars? The company would be adding to their already five–-to handle the forthcoming election of 2020.
Almost three years later, the mailed-in ballots so hot and heavy in the news right now are sent to print vendor Runbeck Election Services, about six miles away from Maricopa’s own Tabulation Center in Phoenix.
Every single completed mail-in ballot, whether mailed or dropped off at a polling place, goes straight to Runbeck.
Today, while America waits, all mail-in ballots that were collected on election day, and the previous few days, are sitting at Runbeck headquarters.
Maricopa has no clue how many ballots are in their possession because the ballots are under no electoral processing supervision. It is no wonder in 2022, America’s future is hanging by a thread as Arizona’s votes are not under control and farmed out to a suspicious vendor with a questionable past.
Who filed a U.S. Patent Application for a computer system for “on-screen ballot duplication” to be used for “generating a revised ballot”?
According to application # 20190311030, Kevin Runbeck did:
Kevin Runbeck has been the Chairman and owner of Runbeck Election Services.
Stunningly, government records indicate Brian Runbeck, who worked for his family’s ballot printing company, was a prolific monetary contributor (over 50 times in 2020) to Act Blue, Biden for President and the Democrat Senatorial Campaign Committee.
Rey Valenzuela, who was Maricopa County elections director in 2020, had a curious relationship to Kevin Runbeck, owner of the printing company. He was highlighted on Runbeck’s website during the 2020 fiasco.
(Note: The reference by Valenzuela has been taken down from the Runbeck website.)
Sworn Testimony
When Rudy Giuliani and Arizona state legislatures held public hearings regarding the Maricopa County election fraud of November 2020, among the most compelling sworn testimonies came from elections witness Jan Bryant.
Her testimony coincided with others and may explain Arizona audit director Ken Bennett’s later revelation that Dominion Voting Systems had refused to comply with a subpoena to turn over passwords to its Maricopa County voting machines.
During the hearing on November 30, 2020, Bryant testified under oath that not even county IT staff were allowed access to the machines.
Bryant witnessed Dominion employees with a laptop computer in the counting room during the six days she worked at the Maricopa County Election Center.
During questioning by Republican state Rep. Mark Finchem, Bryant said there were daily election ballot deliveries to the center by Runbeck Election Services. According to witness testimony, these deliveries happened from Nov. 3 to at least Nov. 10.
Repeated explanations by supervisors at that time was that “Runbeck has high speed scanners,” Bryant said. She was told the ballots were scanned offsite by Runbeck and then delivered to the Maricopa County Election Center.
Transcript Quotes from Bryant’s testimony:
Jan Bryant: …ten days before they quit tabulating they thought they were done. And then more truck loads of ballots would come in. And I’m like, how can you not know how many ballots are still out there.
State House Rep. David L. Cook: Mr. Chairman I’m sorry. WOULD YOU REPEAT THAT. They thought they were done, and then there was WHAT?
Jan Bryant: They thought they were done multiple times. Multiple times the people that were running the rooms thought they were done (counting ballots), or almost done. Or were gonna be done Wednesday morning (Nov. 4th), then Thursday morning (Nov. 5th), then Friday morning. Then it went on the whole next week. And I’m like, I asked the question, You don’t know how many ballots are still left to come in? I don’t know who does, again…process…project management, but zero.
Forward to 2022 and Maricopa taxpayers continue to pay for Runbeck because they have “high-speed scanners.”
hmm reminds me of the kid not ready for his exam who called in a bomb scare...what would happen to a trial, or election and runback? no i am not advocating such, just wondering if it would help or hinder dems as they might be desperate enough to try it.
My take away from watching yesterday was that the ballot on demand printer system was the issue. To be a troubleshooter you have to know HOW THE SYSTEM works! In the article title you have the word “jam” which is inaccurate. People would go in to vote and because people can vote anywhere these printers more or less print a “personalized ballot” for the voter based upon their address. The ballot paper is 20 inches in size. The printer was supposed to print a 20 inch ballot that had markings on it so when it is fed into the tabulator the tabulator would read it correctly. HOWEVER, an administrator privileged user or hacker changed the print settings so that the printed ballot image came out as a 19 inch ballot image. When the voter puts their ballot into the tabulator BAM it spits it out and rejects it because it is not finding the 20 inch ballot markings in the correct location… THE STOPPAGE starts at this point… the techs are called in to “troubleshoot” the “printer” issue or whatever is causing the ballot rejection. One of the most basic elements of troubleshooting is defining the problem. No technician on the planet could ‘fix’ a wrong sized ballot. Chaos ensued and the lines backed up… the tech described cleaning the corona wire and shaking the toner cartridge! It was no different than taking your car into a mechanic and him replacing every component on the car guessing what the problem is and charging you at the same time! All part of the RAT/RINO plan! “Drawer 3” was part of their plan. No voter was rejected… all they had to do was place it in the magic drawer to be “counted” later! It would be rejected later at a downtown tabulator and then it would be “transposed” onto a new 20 inch ballot by of course upstanding citizens… There is 100% certainty that the 19 inch setting was done through malice and intent to disrupt the election. It was not done accidentally.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.