Very good.
Except they’re forgetting that the SENATE is the one who actually CONVICTS. And who controls the Senate?
No point in even doing it unless there’s a chance to convict.
Nixon was never convicted.
This is down the line in terms of offenses. “10%” from the Chinese payola would be up there.
It’s more than just “who contrals the Senate,” two thirds are requires.
Who cares, impeach the b@stard. The “it doesn’t matter if we impeach him or not” crowd” are clueless. Hit back, for God’s sake.
“No point in even doing it unless there’s a chance to convict”
Got a disagree with that.
Two things will happen:
1: bidens criminal activity gets put into in the light (although the lefty media will ignore it)
2. The investigations go into the permanent public House record.
Let them waste time. It will keep them from screwing up so much or surrendering more. Both are repooblican hall marks.
Very true.
But there is some merit in showing the evidence. In any investigation, if done properly, if enough facts come out the case decides itself
Of course, the Senate wouldn’t convict him so don’t even worry about that.
But laying it all out there, showing that he truly is worthy of impeachment is almost as good as an impeachment. He and the Senate will have surrendered any momentum or presence, for lack of a better term.
Imagine them proving that what he did was impeachable. Schumer and the rest don’t convict. From that pint on, they all have that cloud over their head.
One reporter…”Sen Schumer, in light of the overwhelming evidence discovered by the House, how could the Senate not convict?” That’s a tough answer, even for a POS like Schumer.