Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Whip Steve Scalise: House GOP Will Debate All 12 Appropriations Bills Individually, No Omnibus
realclearpolitics.com ^ | 12/7/22 | Tim Hains

Posted on 12/08/2022 6:19:40 AM PST by cotton1706

House Minority Whip (who will probably be the Republican Majority Leader next year) Rep. Steve Scalise told Fox Business Network's Larry Kudlow on Tuesday that House Republicans will try to pass individual appropriations bills next year instead of passing an omnibus.

"We've got to get away from these big spending bills, it is why we have inflation and the high cost of everything now. The government went on a drunken spending spree the last two years, every bill was a trillion for this, a trillion for that. Ultimately, somebody has to pay for it," Scalise said.

"We’ve talked about doing it differently and we’ve laid out a calendar for next year to be able to bring all twelve of the appropriations bills, individually, debate each item separately, vote up or down based on the merits of what’s in it, have real fiscal restraint, make agencies justify what they’re doing with your hard-earned taxpayer dollars," Scalise told Larry Kudlow.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections
Now what will happen with this is that the Senate will do what it usually does - dither till September.

Then, they will threaten a government shutdown unless the House bundles everything into one bill. Then we'll have a continuing resolution till December, then they'll again want to bundle everything into one large, one vote bill.

This has been the game since 2007, to neuter the House's power over spending.

1 posted on 12/08/2022 6:19:41 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Also, will McCarthy even back him?


2 posted on 12/08/2022 6:33:37 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Yes! This sounds like a god start. Omnibus was always a cram down with all sorts of garbage hidden inside.


3 posted on 12/08/2022 6:42:07 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
“… The government went on a drunken spending spree the last two years,”
This sounds like selective amnesia. Does he not recall every budget during the Trump administration passed with more democrat votes than Republican? But I’m sure this plays well with the people for whom history begins every morning when they open their eyes. Go get ‘em Scalise, you’re a budget Hawk!
4 posted on 12/08/2022 6:52:06 AM PST by Yogafist (Voting rino is voting for the managed decline of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Oh no! “Regular Order”! We can’t have THAT!!!! /sarc


5 posted on 12/08/2022 7:08:34 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Can we get them done early in the year instead of the end of the year?


6 posted on 12/08/2022 7:33:05 AM PST by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT

“will try”
A good start - if they stick with it


7 posted on 12/08/2022 7:38:27 AM PST by aumrl (let's keep it real Conservatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pas

“Can we get them done early in the year instead of the end of the year?”

The House can. But the Senate will have no desire to, because their INTENTION is an Omnibus, that is, the ENTIRE government’s funding in ONE vote, forced, at the point of a gun, with maximum pressure brought to bear, on September 30th (end of fiscal year) or just before Christmas.

And they do this EVERY year. And also, even if the Senate passed separate bills, then the House and Senate would have to reconcile in a Conference Committee, and the Democrats would filibuster the choice of conferees (which they’ve done before, and Mitch was all for that by the way since that was an excuse not to go to conference and bundle everything into one bill).

It’s all a game. And it’s been this way since Pelosi took over the House (and Schumer took over head of tactics in the Senate at the same time).

Regular order is out the window, because Regular order is a check to power, and they want to eliminate checks to THEIR power.


8 posted on 12/08/2022 7:45:51 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Should never have reached the point where relying on an omnibus bill was an easy fallback position.


9 posted on 12/08/2022 7:48:56 AM PST by Zman (Liberals: denying reality since Day One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

LINE ITEM VETO is long overdue


10 posted on 12/08/2022 8:13:16 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Separate the spending bills into individual votes. One item per page, voting one page at a time.

And yes, that would take until Mothers Day.


11 posted on 12/08/2022 9:53:45 AM PST by lurk (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson