Posted on 12/06/2022 7:43:17 AM PST by Red Badger
Like most such NGOs, I'm sure it's just another Communist/Democrat Party front group.
What a surprise. Conservatives always under investigation while scaggy Democrats go about their merry way.
It's actually the Physician's Committee for Responsible Medicine, and I don't know if they have a problem with people eating meat. What I do know is that this battle has been going on for awhile. Here's one example from September:
https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/physicians-committees-lawsuit-against-elon-musk-company-neuralink-reveals
I believe the first complaint filed by these people was as far back as March.
“Like most such NGOs, I’m sure it’s just another Communist/Democrat Party front group.”
And people here repeat their propaganda!
The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) is a non-profit research and advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C., which promotes a plant-based diet, preventive medicine, and alternatives to animal research,
Relationship with animal rights groups
PCRM has had a long standing relationship with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), including receiving $1.3M from PETA.[36] Barnard and PETA’s Ingrid Newkirk both were on the board of Foundation to Support Animal Protection (also known as PETA Foundation), and FSAP did the accounting for both PETA and PCRM.[37] Barnard did not deny that there is a relationship with PETA during an interview with The New York Times in 2004.[38]
PCRM has had ties with Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC)—Jerry Vlasak was a former spokesman for PCRM and Barnard co-signed a letter with Kevin Kjonaas to hundreds of bosses of companies involved with Huntingdon on PCRM letterhead.[36] SHAC has been called a domestic terrorist threat by the U.S. Department of Justice.[37]
The Center for Consumer Freedom, which represents the interests of restaurants and food companies, considers PCRM to be a front for PETA, saying that “its food rankings reflect that agenda” of opposing meat and dairy products, and “they do a very slick job of obscuring their real intentions”.[38]
American Medical Association
The American Medical Association (AMA) has criticized PCRM’s positions. In 1990, the AMA adopted a resolution condemning PCRM’s activism against the use of animals in research, objecting to PCRM “implying that physicians who support the use of animals in biomedical research are irresponsible, for misrepresenting the critical role animals play in research and teaching, and for obscuring the overwhelming support for such research which exists among practicing physicians in the United States.”[39]
wiki
I don’t think Musk is a conservative, although the hard leftists look at him as being to their right.
“free speech” ideals (even though he isn’t advocating for ultimate free speech) is contrary to their ideal to censor the masses political information stream, and a HUGE threat to their power structure.
Musk may or may not care if a single republican ever wins, but that doesn’t matter to the state-ists and globalists. Much more than controlling what people do hear and read, they truly NEED to control what people can’t hear or read.
They had that control over the MSM for decades and they took control of the new media. They can’t lose it all now.
I don't think this committee being Vegan takes away from the horror shows they are describing, which itself is sourced from Elon Musk whistleblowers in Neurolink.
In any case, this disproves the article which is framing this situation as if it JUST happened and is a response to Elon and twitter.
“It’s actually the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine, and I don’t know if they have a problem with people eating meat. “
They do. And your advocacy of that group promotes their cause.
bkmk
Name it.
Please stop being an unhinged ideologue. I did not "advocate" for them. I merely corrected the claims in this article which are false. I am not a vegan. I'm eating meat right now. And whether Musk is torturing to death animals in a way that violates the law is going to be settled in a court, in any case, which is where all this is going.
How long before the FBI visits all of his companies with search warrants?
“I don’t think Musk is a conservative, although the hard leftists look at him as being to their right.”
He has urged his >100 million followers to vote republican an said he backs DeSantis 2024.
“Please stop being an unhinged ideologue. I did not “advocate” for them. I merely corrected the claims in this article which are false.”
You posted their propaganda. That is advocating their meatless diet agenda.
So it follows that you support the lies and propaganda of the Daily Wire, which you yourself have proven was lying about the investigation and its origins and timing.
See, we can both play that game.
“I don’t think this committee being Vegan takes away from the horror shows they are describing, “
Why are you still defending this anti-meat advocacy group?
A group that wants to ban all animal testing.
The Physicians Committee advertising campaign “I was lovin’ it”, a spoof of the McDonald’s advertising slogan “I’m lovin’ it”, was used in a September 2010 advertising campaign encouraging consumers to adopt a vegetarian diet to avoid the health risks associated with the high levels of dietary fat, cholesterol, and sodium in McDonald’s food. The campaign launched in the Washington, D.C., area showed a grieving woman in a morgue, as the camera circled around a middle-aged man draped in a white sheet and clutching a partially-eaten hamburger.[32]
wiki
“See, we can both play that game.”
You are admitting your support for PCRM and PETA. For a meatless diet and no lab animal testing.
What about their holistic alternative remedies?
I don’t know. Maybe he sent a mean tweet one time?
You are admitting your reading comprehension and IQ are really bad.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.