Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

James Woods is taking NO prisoners after learning Team Biden worked to silence him and D*MN (#TwitterFiles AKA #Twittergate)
Twitchy.com ^ | 12/4/2022 | Sam Janney

Posted on 12/04/2022 9:03:04 AM PST by NetAddicted

As Twitchy readers (and Tucker Carlson viewers) know, James Woods was targeted by the Biden team for silencing and censorship during the 2020 election. So many of us were … and we get the feeling we are just seeing the tip of this corruption iceberg.

Woods is pissed, and rightfully so.

But wow, looking through his timeline? He’s taking NO prisoners and we’re here for it.

Thank you, @elonmusk, for giving back to all Americans, and voices around the world, the most precious of gifts – free and open speech.

I admire you and I salute you, sir.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Keep going.

How is the Twitter Files chicanery any different from Watergate in sum and substance?

Nixon resigned when his henchmen tried to subvert free speech.

Your turn, Mr. Biden.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Your turn, Mr. Biden.

Thousands of people reached out to Woods about being silenced.

I see it and I hear you. Thank you. https://t.co/wfJCaFGXQi

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

He’s so damn cool.

Seriously.

I humbly thank the thousands of you who offered such kind words of support tonight. I wish I could respond to each of you.

As heartbreaking as it is to see our nation highjacked by these grifters, it is equally heartwarming to see how many Americans still love this great nation.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Damn right.

Agree. How would you like to fund a class action suit for those who were suppressed? I’ll be happy to be lead plaintiff. Thank you, @elonmusk https://t.co/zAAjcEnoFu

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

!!!

This. Must. Happen.

To my friends in the Democratic Party:

This now documented attack by the DNC is a troubling issue that transcends politics. If the shoe were on the other foot, you would rightfully be enraged. Please join us as Americans on this one. It’s too important to do otherwise. #Twitter

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Psh, Democrats are far more concerned with being in charge than they are with what happened on their watch. Orange man bad and stuff.

To my friends in the Republican Party:

If your patriotism is genuine, not all bluff and bluster, let loose the dogs of war.

Because true patriots will no longer stand to see our rights trampled by the DNC and its slimy cronies in media and the bowels of government. #Twitter

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

LET LOOSE THE DOGS OF WAR.

YAAAAAS.

I do see this, and I hear you. While I do not know you, I know your heart and share your sorrow. You are who I’m doing this for. Thank you for sharing what so many of us have felt during this never-ending purge. It is you, sir, who should be thanked, and I humbly do so. https://t.co/E5VW3hcDCH

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Awwwwwww.

For those of you who have not seen the primary material by @mtaibbi regarding the suppression collusion of the DNC and Twitter during the Biden campaign, here is the thread. #TwitterFiles https://t.co/I0Mmia8vil

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Just in case people missed it.

He’s a giver.

As of noon December 3. Clearly this is not going away. #TwitterFiles pic.twitter.com/IRKYw4OWWm

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

Not going away, Biden.

Not going away, Democrats.

I just noticed that I gained another 100,000 followers since @elonmusk saved Twitter from the suppressors of free speech. That’s 300,000 people in a few weeks, many of whose voices were silenced and are now free once again to enjoy the rights guaranteed by our constitution. 🙏

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

This.

Friends, I am a bit inundated by media requests at the moment.

Given the serious nature of the revelations coming from the president’s son’s laptop, I am reserving comment until my attorneys have fully evaluated the scope of the potentially actionable offenses. #TWITTERGATE

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 3, 2022

“Finally, proof Twitter invented reason to help Joe Biden win in 2020” – New York Post Editorial Board

They suspended a newspaper founded by Alexander Hamilton, because the truth would have cost Biden the presidency. https://t.co/nPXHdYe3E5

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 4, 2022

BOOM.

Who would you trust more to deliver honest reportage of the news?

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) December 4, 2022

Guess who’s winning?

Hint, it ain’t the Corporate Media.

***

Related:

Ana Navarro learns the hard way NOT to throw rocks at ANYONE’S appearance from her large glass house

David French’s #TwitterFiles take SO embarrassingly bad even Elon Musk responds and OUCH

Tom Nichols claiming he’s a ‘certified political scientist’ trying to dunk on Elon Musk goes SO wrong

***

tags:2020 ELECTION, BIDEN, HUNTER BIDEN, JAMES WOODS, TWITTER, TWITTERFILES

********************************************************** trending (current Twitchy articles, which I find interesting) -------- Matt Taibbi’s reaction to corporate media trashing him over #TwitterFiles is quite simply PERFECTION -------- Miranda Devine ENDS smug NPR journo scoffing at Hunter Biden story in heated back and forth


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elonmusk; illelevantassholes; irelevantactor; jamesbaker; jamesbakergate; jameswoods; shutupandact; taibbi; twitchy; twitter; twitterfiles; twittergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last
To: Enterprise

The first amendment was against government censorship, not private places. You going to the town square or publishing something against them. If you’re concerned about censorship, talk to the thousands who have been zotted from here over the years. Some deservedly. But zotted none the less.


21 posted on 12/04/2022 9:32:41 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

“that right to post on Twitter that our forefathers died for.”

Maybe YOUR forefathers didn’t die for your right to post on Twitter today, but mine sure did. Free speech is free speech, no matter what the century.

You probably believe that the Second Amendment only applies to muskets, too.


22 posted on 12/04/2022 9:34:20 AM PST by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. N. Wolfe

Sometimes conservatives blow it. They’re on the wrong side of certain things. There’s nothing wrong with having that discussion. Too many want a echo chamber instead of competing in the arena of ideas and to stand up to that echo chamber is wrong.


23 posted on 12/04/2022 9:35:30 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

No, the right not to have the government suppress speech of the citizens in the public square.


24 posted on 12/04/2022 9:37:22 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
"The first amendment was against government censorship, not private places."

The GOVERNMENT urged a PRIVATE enterprise to CENSOR people. That my friend is a GOVERNMENT action, and it denies people their First Amendment Right to FREEDOM OF SPEECH! I cannot emphasize strongly enough that the GOVERNMENT cannot deny the citizens their right to freedom of speech, nor can the GOVERNMENT compel someone to censor speech on its behalf! It is called by its true name - GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP!

25 posted on 12/04/2022 9:37:54 AM PST by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

You’ve obviously never followed @realJamesWoods.


26 posted on 12/04/2022 9:37:56 AM PST by NetAddicted (MAGA2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

“The first amendment was against government censorship, not private places.”

The courts have ruled many times that when the government acts in concert with a private party to suppress speech, it is no different than the government itself suppressing speech. This is a clear 1st amendment violation.


27 posted on 12/04/2022 9:40:16 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

There it is.


28 posted on 12/04/2022 9:41:34 AM PST by sauropod (Fascists also buy Comcast cable packages" - Olby - Wanna buy mine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Bla bla bla...where are the television and radio ads taking these issues straight to the voters? Where are the articles taking the media itself to task? Where are the hearings on big media and big tech colluding with government...where are the $T class action lawsuits?


29 posted on 12/04/2022 9:41:49 AM PST by fuente (Liberty resides in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box--Fredrick Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luke21

You got that right.

My BOD: April 1998.


30 posted on 12/04/2022 9:42:54 AM PST by sauropod (Fascists also buy Comcast cable packages" - Olby - Wanna buy mine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: fuente

Voters? You mean the men behind the curtain who write code? lol


31 posted on 12/04/2022 9:43:36 AM PST by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
The first amendment was against government censorship, not private places

That’s right. Hitler didn’t murder Jews, I. G. Far enough, a private company did, so it’s all good. That Hitler told them to is immaterial.

32 posted on 12/04/2022 9:43:39 AM PST by Sirius Lee (They intend to murder us. Prep if you want to live and live like you are prepping for eternal life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
the Government contacts a publisher, or a forum, and tells the moderators to censor ideas and posters it finds disagreeable.

Perfectly stated.
33 posted on 12/04/2022 9:43:48 AM PST by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Funny, but in this case, Biden and his team weren’t the government, but a candidate. And in the data dump, it was said Trump as both a candidate and elected official did the same thing, only not as frequently. Can you give me some examples of your claim?


34 posted on 12/04/2022 9:44:39 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

That individual can still communicate their thoughts and beliefs. Maybe not to a mass audience, but to anyone within earshot.


35 posted on 12/04/2022 9:46:17 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

Apples/Oranges.


36 posted on 12/04/2022 9:47:32 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

I was kicked off for telling the truth about the dem party…the party of slavery,rebellion, Jim Crow, segregation, and Bull Connor


37 posted on 12/04/2022 9:47:55 AM PST by Nifster (OI see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NetAddicted

Meaning?


38 posted on 12/04/2022 9:48:19 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fuente

Congressional hearings will start in 2023.


39 posted on 12/04/2022 9:51:21 AM PST by NetAddicted (MAGA2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

The fact that government agents were requesting a private company restrict specific speech on a public forum under any rubric, however intellectually dishonest or fictional, is apparently lost on you.

This was an thinly veiled end run around 1st amendment protection.


40 posted on 12/04/2022 9:52:19 AM PST by jurroppi1 (The Left doesn't have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson