I still disagree. Why else this,
“ UNPRECEDENTED FRAUD REQUIRES UNPRECEDENTED CURE!“
The cure being suspension of the Constitution (as it pertains to elections) so that either a new election can be held election or the results thrown out and the rightful winner installed.
You have to do a lot of spinning to conclude Trump is not stating the fraud by the Dems justifies such actions. I am not denying the fraud I am denying that Trump is not advocating a very wrong remedy.
False equivalence. The “unprecedented cure” can very well be constitutional since the goal is restoration of the Constitution itself.
Are you engaging in fraud denial? I hope not.