There is an interesting potential twist here. So let’s say for argument’s sake that Biden people and Twitter people and “deep state” intel type people and their proxies colluded to suppress news that would be important to voters. And Musk decides that this, as a matter of principle, is something that the public needs to know all about.
For one, it could be a great story for Twitter and Musk. Could generate a lot of media attention. On the other hand, it suggests all sorts of nefarious activity between politicians and media - not that this should be any kind of surprise to anyone. Dan Rather, Stephanopolous, Psaki etc these people are all political operatives masquerading as journalists.
So I wonder, if there was a “bombshell” and Twitter made a conscious decision (which we all pretty much know they did) do throw in with one candidate and it was so obvious that they had 1000s of emails and communiqués and internal chat board chatter linking social media and political operatives and intel people - would it even make the news?
Could the news actually ignore it, if it was all over Twitter?
They will just say “Musk CLAIMS” or we couldn’t independently verify this.
Of course, Russia collusion was 100% fake and yet they ran with it and spread it like it was the word of God.
At this point fake news is just that Fake. And then this just needs to be told to everyone. Make their trustworthy rating less than congress.
pretty squirrely