Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: soozla
You’re focusing on the classification of the documents. Just having the documents after being in office violates the statute.

You would think Trump’s attorney would have brought up Navy v Eagan in his Sept appearance before the court.

49 posted on 11/18/2022 3:47:37 PM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks

He did....see p.33 at index. But YOU knew that!! LOL https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22A283/242439/20221004150805615_22-%20Application%20for%20Stay.pdf


50 posted on 11/18/2022 4:46:43 PM PST by soozla (Truth prevails, regardless of who is willing to accept it ~ now or later. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson