Sorry, my friend Golden Eagle. When an unnamed source can lead somebody to ask the snide question, "can’t this guy keep it in the pants one time?", it's TDS.
Especially given the long list of examples where such unnamed sources turned out to be BS.
Several are just tired of the incessant Trump talk when this election has very little, if anything, to do with him, and this move would ratchet that focus up to even more unbearable levels.
What's tiring are the incessant unnamed sources turning out to be wrong. And I'm appreciative of Trump for campaigning across the country, during several campaign cycles, for numerous candidates.
Thank you for your comments, which I hope to respectfully address. I agree that the referenced quote was snide in nature, and completely and honestly understand your frustrations with these media types constantly stirring our pot with unnamed sources, effectively pushing us into one another to start a fight like older kids do to younger ones on the playground.
I’m just trying to ratchet down the name calling, which isn’t a healthy form of debate, or discussion, and typically only leads to escalation and even harder positions in the future.
This goes for both sides, we should try to avoid calling each other deranged, or cultists, as that is typically not accurate, nor the proper way to address other adults.
Maybe I’m being too idealistic, but I unfortunately see the likelihood of these discussions on whose candidate is better increasing in future, and as I may be caught in the middle of a few, I’d like to keep them as respectful as possible.
Hope that seems reasonable, thanks.