Posted on 11/04/2022 10:02:26 AM PDT by fwdude
Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 is a 9-0 U.S. Supreme Court decision handed down in 1997. The court had agreed to take up the issue of federal statutes vs. states' regarding election for federal offices and state election dates, ruling that "Election Day" means what it says: a singular day. The case that started it: Murphy J. Foster Jr., Governor of Louisiana, et al., Petitioners v. G. Scott Love, Paul S. Bergeron, Kathleen B. Balhoff, and Bennie Baker-Bourgeois.
(snip)
Constitutional attorney Ren Jander's Nov. 18, 2020, piece, "Elections Undecided by Midnight are Void & Preempted by Federal Law – Foster v Love (1997; 9-0 Decision)" is a thorough examination of that case and federal statutes. Jander wrote, "Federal Election Day statutes were designed to curtail fraud, and to infuse a prima facie sense of integrity in our electoral process. But these States – in failing to obey Congressional deadlines – have flagrantly attempted to preempt federal law. This is certainly prohibited, and this is why the late election results are void."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Good luck enforcing it.
They feel like they have to cater to every single person who has “circumstances” or it’s labeled disenfranchised . God forbid. /s
Yup that’s how they steal votes.
Republicans should play that game right back until the mess gets straightened out.
Democrats cheating has only gotten slight attention in recent years. Due to their own stupidity in covering their tracks, sending emails , and electronic Trails which they can’t fully erase. Just think how long they’ve been cheating. They’re very existence depends on it. Their income and the incomes of their family members and friends always depend on it. That’s why Democrats will openly violate the constitution in order to try and stop Trump. They are fighting for their shady political lives and to keep their illegal acts buried just like the numerous Clinton bodies and the Biden financial windfalls.
It’s time to rid our nation of Democrat elected officials. Vote them all out.
This car had nothing to do with receiving or counting ballots on election day.
Re: 25 - This was debunked yesterday. Expect it to be re-posted multiple times in the next few days.
Apparently until they don’t.
Mail in ballots, no.
So if the leftist post office can delay military and ballots from republican postmarks until the day after, they win?
We need to get away from mail-in completely.
It takes a. While to find BOXES and BOXES of UNCOUNTED BALLOTS!!!!
Don’t expect the Supreme Court to entertain those previous decisions. They’ve already shown they won’t honor the decisions that past Supreme Courts have made.
Merritt Garland replied, “Election Day’s personal pronoun is they/them. They can be as many days as they want.”
Ah come on. They are all received on election day. They just are not found until days and weeks later/ as needed.
And we did it with NO modern technology and crude communications and transportation modes. Imagine that.
My mother has advanced COPD and just walking to the restroom is an arduous trek. Getting out is like running 2 marathons. People like here should be the exception for voting by mail. But those ballots should receive extra scrutiny.
Voting is a responsibility and if people don’t want to take it seriously, then that’s on them.
I remember watching the Brexit vote with much interest and how the votes were hand-counted and reported as they came available.
The more ways for voting (mail-in, drive-br, electronic, etc) to occur the more likelihood that some shenanigans can occur. Likewise with the early voting, in that the data and/or votes and voter rolls must be managed.
2020 disagrees.
We don’t have an “election day”, not even an election month. We have an election season.
P>
But Brandon wants us to be patient so the left has plenty of time for malarkey, deception, tampering, reworking of computer-counting protocols, deleting of data, curing of the errant ballots that really should be vores for Democrats, and all other methods of bull-jive.
“This car had nothing to do with receiving or counting ballots on election day.”
This CASE had nothing to do with receiving or counting ballots on election day.
Obviously American law is now moot, especially a SCOTUS decision against the democrat DC establishment machine. Who’s going to enforce the law when the criminals in law enforcement are being paid more not to?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.