Posted on 10/31/2022 12:31:57 PM PDT by artichokegrower
David DePape, the man accused of breaking into the Pelosi's home and leaving Paul Pelosi in critical condition, stated that he wanted to hold the House speaker hostage and 'break her kneecaps' if she lied to him, according to the FBI.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
It presupposes land lines with multiple extensions throughout the mansion.
Ba-loney. He wanted to push in Paul’s stool.
This was a job for Tanya Harding ...
1) An eye witness saw him outside dressd all in black with a backpack.
2) His politics are as unknowable as any of his other arbitrary, meandering thoughts. He’s certifiable and a druggie.
3)There wasn’t a third person. Fog of war, as ALWAYS happens. Pelosi answered the door, despite being under duress.
4)He busted in the glass door at the rear with his hammer, laid down his back and opened the door. Mr. Pelosi is a private citizen and doesn’t get government protection while Nancy is not with him. He travels a lot, a very lot, and may not always have the time or inclination to set up an elaborate system for any and all circumstances. That will certainly change.
5)There may well be all manner of camera footage.
“Other Democrats”
Because he’s a Democrat?
Zip ties like the Kavanagh assassin?
Y’think? ;^)
You could add: Why did Paul Pelosi come out of the bathroom instead of locking himself in and staying on the phone with police?
But what you posted does not explain the discrepancy between what was posted in post #3 and what was in the Daily Mail article per my post #44.
Post #3 reads “Paul Pelosi, ONE OF TWO PEOPLE AT HOME at the time of the incident, called the police who arrived two minutes later...”
The Daily Mail article reads “Paul Pelosi, who was THE ONLY ONE HOME when DePape broke in, called the police who arrived two minutes later...”
An illegal alien, which Nasty supports, attacks her Husband and is saved by the Storm Troopers she hates.
They’ll release the body cam videos after they finish producing it. It is still in pre-production.
I copy and pasted directly from the article as the article existed at the time of the timestamp of my post. If the article reads differently now, they changed it after my posting.
I see post 92 addresses this.
Looks like a bunch of fabricated stuff to make it look like a political attack instead of what it was.
That is quite a story. Has the screenplay been opted yet?
This must be the “October Surprise”!
Generate sympathy for poor Nancy Pelosi.
Get the based fired up and motivate the “squishy middle”.
You didn’t read the FBI complain, did you...
Arghhhh... COMPLAINT
I read it the minute it was available and posted its link to threads here.
Please identify the fabrications.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.