Apparently the perp had a naked fetish thing. This would make the underwear description make sense.
What doesn’t make sense is how he got past security cameras and all the rest.
As mentioned in earlier posts, charging the perp with breaking and entering and also body can footage will tell more of the story.
Anyone have the recordings of the 911 calls?
Finding out just what happened behind stonewalls may be difficult, but finding pants might be possible. Did he arrive pantsless, which they can sell as just another SF nut, or did he arrive with pants and somehow lose them before the altercation? In which case explaining ‘somehow’ will be challenging. Especially if the Democrats don’t want the rest of the country (her district won’t care) to realize that Nancy doesn’t have enough cajones to satisfy her husband.