What indication is there that the attacker even knew who he was? Crazies attacking strangers is a common phenomenon.
If the guy had attacked an ordinary citizen he’d already be out on bail...
Freeper Godzilla’s list:
“1. The 911 call raises serious red flags – “RP [Reporting Person] stated that there’s a male in the home and that he’s going to wait for his wife. RP stated that he doesn’t know who the male is but he advised that his name is David, and that he is a friend,” the dispatch official said. “RP sounded somewhat confused.
2. DePape lives in a Berkeley house dubbed a “hippie collective” by neighbors, with BLM, LGBT and other leftist signs/symbols adorning the walls and windows.
3. DePape is reported to be a ‘Former Castro Nudist Protester’ The reference to ‘Castro’ is to the Gay district in San Francisco.
4. Not only was he a nudist but he was a member of the Green Party.
5. Police say that when they responded to the home around 2:30 a.m., they found both struggling for a hammer wearing only their underwear.
6. How did a guy wearing only underwear get past security?
7. Pelosi has a drinking problem (see recent DUI). “somewhat confused”
8. Nancy was out of town
The following is simple speculation – but is this event the result of a ‘lovers spat’? A ‘hook up’ gone bad? The police statements and the sudden silence on the left makes one say ‘hmmmmmm’. Clearly, the leftist narrative that DePape was some rightwinger is out the window. What is left is clearly strange and will likely be heavily covered up.
I guess the reference to Nanzi might be a clue.