Security is something you could have if you want. But if you don’t, then a hundred millionaire husband of the speaker would have to actively dismiss or turn off security. This guy who is a “friend” in his underwear named David must have had access given to him at some point.
Just a question (I’ve read two separate SF articles on this)....was ‘David’ in his actual underwear, or was he nude? And could he have been in Paul’s underwear? If he was a nude activist....seems like he would have been in the nude unless it was a bit too chilly in SF (in Oct).