Replies

I am confused.

Does this mean that some sort of reciprocity between states is on the table?

Or, does this mean that because he lost his Ma LTC. It should be reinstated?

2 posted on 10/12/2022 7:24:27 AM PDT by uranium penguin

To: uranium penguin

3 posted on 10/12/2022 7:27:31 AM PDT by chaosagent (Remember, no matter how you slice it, forbidden fruit still tastes the sweetest!)

To: uranium penguin

Or, does this mean that because he lost his Ma LTC. It should be reinstated?

The case was specific to him obtaining a permit to own firearms. The Supreme Court cited Bruen, so it appears his license to carry will be restored.

There are lots of precedents that traveling armed was given greater protection in the early republic than ordinary.

So far, I have not seen a case in the courts challenging the power of states to restrict people from other states from carrying.

I think it will be brought, now that Bruen has been decided.

It is hard to believe a fundamental and enumerated right stops at a state's border.

12 posted on 10/12/2022 8:55:25 AM PDT by marktwain

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794