Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lightman

So 3rd circuit tells Ritter, have to count defective ballots, Ritter goes to Supremes. SC refuses to stop counting. Ritter loses. 3rd rules you can count ballots in violation of state law. SC says no you can’t. SC establishes that 3rd circuit decision was wrong and it cost Ritter the election, but Ritters election can’t be overturned. Only if it happens again. Way to go Supremes! In other news SC refuses to hear case when a fetus becomes entitled to constitional rights. They gladly give those rights to illegals, but will not discuss for the unborn. Useless bastards washed their hands of their most important responsibility when they walked away from Roe v Wade this year. Now anyone can decide who lives and who dies. Anarchy is here we just don’t realize it. What a shame no one thought to enshrine a human right to life in the condition. The declaration mentioned it, but that’s not the law. Supremely sucking SC.


24 posted on 10/11/2022 9:49:11 AM PDT by pghbjugop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pghbjugop

That’s how it goes... and the crazy thing is if someone challenges BEFORE the election, the court is just as likely to say the issue is not yet “ripe”. But after the election, it is “moot.”


30 posted on 10/11/2022 10:35:34 AM PDT by Tipllub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson