Good point, that is true for courts like SCOTUS (the case here) with lifetime appointments. There may be more accountability in State and Muni Courts where Judges must stand for Election (Remembering that courts are actually part of the Government, and the best Government is the least Government.
I don’t need overgrown lawyers interpreting what the agenda driven elected officials wish to get by with and make it more confusing than it was.
No honest American does, Shyster Lawyers that weaponize Law and Courts against John Ordinary Public for control and thievery, are the norm in America now.
Additionally, proposed Law is written to do the opposite of what John Ordinary Public wants and named to fool John Ordinary Public into supporting those Laws.
Especially when the judges wish to comingle foreign laws into their evaluation...
This is one of the Globo (as in GloboHomoNazi) goals, and has been since the League of Nations went the way the UN should.
...they (Biased Judges & Shyster Lawyers) continue to hide behind each other until they can spin away what they are doing in their own screwed up little world that will take years to narrow down and correct.
If ever.
I don't have an answer for you, (and remember, we are talking about people that think it's noble to kill a defenseless baby and grant special privilege to a Homosexual Pedophile Human Trafficker).
“I don’t have an answer for you”
I can’t speak for the lowest level of courts but I can offer an answer for the higher levels. The chain of command on courts is starting at the lowest level required and going up with an argument piece at a time until the law is changed by someone that happens to pertain, the SCOTUS decides to hear it or not and makes a call, or you run out of time and/or money.
Supreme Court justices, court of appeals judges, and district court judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the United States Senate, as stated in the Constitution. It has become the practice of politicians to appoint judges consistent with their personal politics and not exactly with the best interest of the public so the laws they create will hold up in a court challenge. We all know, unfortunately, who these court using politicians are by the way they do the people’s business. It is blaringly obvious and on both sides of the aisle or the surrounding area of created parties. (People like Bernie Sanders listed as a democratic socialist)
So, my answer, I know you’re on the edge of your chair, is simply get rid of the politicians that are not in it to do what their oath says, protect and defend and represent the people they are entrusted (hired) to. Not to represent their interests and prosper ahead of their constituents. At the highest levels, the house, the senate, and the president and his/her (it’s coming) band of merry people, they are no longer entrusted with the business of their state as much as all the states and using the resources and manpower to accomplish an overall goal for the entire country. And their mistakes, or acts on purpose, no longer apply to their little heaven where they’re from as much as the whole country.
If those are gone, the judges will be selected better and more honestly, I hope. I see the name Navy Patriot is your handle. When you were in the business, and if you still are, did you not evaluate each situation with first protecting your troops until you couldn’t any longer? I know I did (career air force, then department of the army, and DOD, over 35 years belonging to someone and making calls for a lot of it) I feel this is where the business has broken down at all levels. Making laws that are not going to fly and having them crashed by judges put in to monitor and surgically remove those that are not in the best interest of the politicians agenda, is not justice. That comes with honesty and integrity which is blatantly absent. Vote the wrong type of people out and put the right ones in. And don’t expect to get it right the first time. It sometimes takes a few treatments to kill all the cock roaches.
wy69