A Climate Cult guide for cowardly Republicans Exclusive: Jonathon Moseley has 29 questions for leftist alarmists claiming to be 'scientists'

While there is no such thing as your first question asks - what is the “correct” termperature range for the planet, looking at changes in global average temperatures over time does not require a “correct” temperature range - only speculation or scienttic inquiry as to what has been and what is. The question about the current global average temperatures, looked at periodically, is not whether or not they are “correct”, but only are they natural - have not been induced in any way by human activity, or induced in some way by huamn activity. The alramists say not only is the latter answer “true” but that it is “excessive” in its impact. Others respectfully disagree.

I could answer yo similarly with repsepct to your number 2 to 7. They are not directly germane to the alaramists claims, becuase, as I said, it is not about some “correct” condition for eacvh of those variables - evan natural variablity of them all has occurred over time. The alarmists claims are not about some hypothetical “correcT” humidity, sea level, precipation, makeup of the atmosphere, or sea ice, for all time, under all condtions. Their question and claim only relates to whether not present temperature (average year by year global temp) has been induced to some degreee by human activity. They say yes, others disagree.

The alarmists do not try to explain past glaciation except to point generally to non-human, earth-sun-cycle, geologic and atmospheric conditions in the past, for past glaciation and retreat, while sticking to their “models” that suggest (to them) that in spite of general “warming” since the end of the last significant period of expansive glaciation followed by its retreat, that human factors (CO2) are “increasing” that rate of warming now (their theory (not mine).

The human societal, economic and finacial problem is that - as some scientists suggest, that the alarmists position is one that even if it has some cedibility, it is in fact alarmist as to current and presictive results, and that alarmist position is causing economic destruction, globally, that will weaken societies and imperil our abilities to even take reaonable measures to mitigate and adjust for “climate change”, even if the alarmists are only partially correct.

Some have said that in the end it is not CO2 the biggset forces behind the climate alarmists want to control - that climate alarmism is a wedge issue to invoke globalist-socialist control of everything.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.