Okay, fine. Give Trump a list of everything they took, and he will tell you what they planted. This judge is trying to get Trump’s lawyers to tip their hand and present any evidence they have now without the prosecution having to expose any of theirs.
Bingo! That’s exactly what’s going on.
Actually, that is exactly what Judge Dearie ordered Team Trump to do.
Dearie asked Trump’s lawyers to submit by 30 September a list of specific items in that inventory “that plaintiff asserts were not seized from the premises”. Dearie also asked them to submit any corrections to the government’s list by that date, including items they believe were seized at Mar-a-Lago but not listed in the inventory.“This submission shall be [Trump’s] final opportunity to raise any factual dispute as to the completeness and accuracy of the detailed property inventory,” wrote Dearie, serving as an independent arbiter known as a special master.
This is why any decent lawyer in a case like this would advise his client NOT to speak about the case, and certainly not to make claims of planted evidence. As Special Master, Dearie could remove any evidence Trump proved was planted, or "not seized from the premises" of Mar a Lago. Of course, when Dearie says this is Trump's "final opportunity" to dispute the evidence, he means dispute it with HIM. Trump can still dispute the evidence in a trial, if he is indicted.