Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden announces push to strip Big Tech of immunity for third-party content (aka censor or get sued)
just the news ^

Posted on 09/15/2022 7:11:55 PM PDT by janetjanet998

President Joe Biden announced on Thursday that his administration would push to end the immunity Big Tech platforms enjoy for third-party content, an effort Republicans previously backed.

"I'm calling on Congress to get rid of special immunity for social media companies and impose much stronger transparency requirements on all of them," the president said, per the New York Post.

Specifically, he called for the repeal of Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, echoing similar demands from Republicans in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, amid the outcry over tech company censorship of explosive allegations against Hunter Biden.

Biden's call, however, came in the context of curtailing online hate speech. With the repeal of Section 230, Biden aims to "hold social media companies accountable for spreading hate-fueled violence."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bananarepublic; biden; bigtech; censorship; civilliberties; civilrights; creepstate; deepstate; despotism; dictatorship; dissent; endthebidenregime; facebook; freespeech; hatespeech; internet; policestate; politicalopposition; section230; singlepartystate; socialmedia; technotyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: ProgressingAmerica

So just to be clear you’re for a full repeal of Section 230 ie you believe the Biden Admin should be able to shutdown sites like FR at will if a random user makes a post here they deem ‘hateful’ or ‘misinformation’?


21 posted on 09/15/2022 8:01:54 PM PDT by jarwulf ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Depends on what replaces it. The Left are all about speech codes, safe spaces, burning and looting to stop speakers on college campuses, etc. they are racists and demand unity through fascism


22 posted on 09/15/2022 8:02:36 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Giant meteor 2022!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Openurmind

This is the correct take.

I don’t and never thought changing 230 is a good idea in a competitive environment. Because there’s competition I think it’s fine as is.


23 posted on 09/15/2022 8:06:34 PM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

230 was only a problem when there was monolithic single platforms without real competition. Is that the case still? I don’t think so.


24 posted on 09/15/2022 8:08:04 PM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

It will be the selective enforcement that will be to our distinct disadvantage. But when has it ever been otherwise?


25 posted on 09/15/2022 8:10:12 PM PDT by calljack (Sometimes your worst nightmare is just a start.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jarwulf
Please do not propagandize me and insert words I did not agree to.

Repealing section 230 will not lead to a shutdown of Free Republic. There is a lot of fearmongering out there and most of it was put out there by the likes of Facebook, Twitter, etc.

Heck, Zuckerberg even went to congress and begged for an increase in regulations.

Had Zuckerberg gotten his way and received an increase of regulations - THAT is what would've shut down Free Republic.

26 posted on 09/15/2022 8:11:17 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (A man's rights rest in 3 boxes. The ballot box, jury box and the cartridge box.- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

I’ve not taken a position regarding 230. I’m asking whether the proposal suddenly becomes bad because Xiden is calling for it now.

When Trump was calling for it, the majority here supported repeal.

Does that change now?


27 posted on 09/15/2022 8:30:38 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
"Biden's call, however, came in the context of curtailing online hate speech.

Biden's dementia filtered concept of "hate speech" is unique in all the universe.
28 posted on 09/15/2022 8:31:36 PM PDT by clearcarbon (Fraudulent elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProgressingAmerica

Spot on! FR already moderates content and removes all violations. Even if section 230 did apply, it’s doubtful that it would make any difference.


29 posted on 09/15/2022 8:32:53 PM PDT by j_guru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: j_guru

I’m sure the Dem Internet hate speech and antimisinformation commissars will agree Jim’s doing a bang up job running this place and leave us and all the conservative sites alone.


30 posted on 09/15/2022 8:37:22 PM PDT by jarwulf ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jarwulf

Repealing Section 230 would not make it legal for the government to simply shut down websites with which it disagrees. Libel/defamation could be the basis for a lawsuit, but that’s really it. The First Amendment would still apply to government efforts to shut down a website.


31 posted on 09/15/2022 9:38:33 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

You need to actually read the OP. The very last sentence says ‘Biden aims to “hold social media companies accountable for spreading hate-fueled violence.”’. The Dems wouldn’t be doing this if they didn’t think they couldn’t gain some advantage out of it.


32 posted on 09/15/2022 10:43:53 PM PDT by jarwulf ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

If Section 230 is repealed, pretty much every photo posted on FreeRepublic could be cause for liability.


33 posted on 09/16/2022 12:37:23 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
It doesn’t affect privately owned sites.

Sure it does. It applies to any "interactive computer service", clearly including FR.

And besides, FB, Twitter, Google, etc. are all privately owned entities under the law.

Having your stock publicly traded doesn't make you a publicly owned company.

34 posted on 09/16/2022 1:50:44 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Better answer: declare them common carriers and strip them of the power to censor content.


35 posted on 09/16/2022 3:56:44 AM PDT by Petrosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

“Similar demands” were to remove section 230 immunity when a platform stops being neutral and starts censoring one side but not the other.


36 posted on 09/16/2022 5:13:37 AM PDT by Eleutheria5 (All Hail the MAGA King, beloved of Ultra MAGAs and Deplorables!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Does the reason matter? Repealed is repealed. Is it good or bad? You have to pick one.

Not a binary choice.

If it is repealed, you then have the issue of enforcement.

Biden would use it to shut down any competitors to Twitter and Facebook, whereas Trump would prevent political censorship and election interference.

I'd ask Congress to refine the law to accomodate these realities.

37 posted on 09/16/2022 5:18:18 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

Yep.


38 posted on 09/16/2022 5:32:43 AM PDT by sauropod (Unbelief has nothing to say. Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

How it will be used, this is one more move to totalitarianism.


39 posted on 09/16/2022 5:39:07 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

https://freerepublic.com/tag/policestate/index


40 posted on 09/16/2022 7:57:41 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson